“You’ve got a lot of fans out there, people are posting, marching in the streets,” the prison security guard tells a young inmate with thick eyebrows, handing him a stack of fan mail. “Apparently, there’s even a musical.”
“What kind of sick fucks would buy tickets to something like that?” the prisoner asks, prompting a round of laughter from the audience.
It’s Monday night and Luigi: The Musical has made its New York City debut as a staged reading to a sold-out crowd at the Green Room 42, a cabaret club in Hell’s Kitchen.
Four actors sit on chairs on stage, three are dressed in orange jumpsuits and one wears a prison guard uniform. The three incarcerated characters are meant to represent United Healthcare CEO shooting suspect Luigi Mangione as well as convicted felons Sean “Diddy” Combs and cryptocurrency entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried. The musical focuses on an imagined friendship between the three men, who at one point were all being held at Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. (In reality, Bankman-Fried and Combs were housed in the same high-profile unit but Mangione was assigned to a unit in a different building entirely.)
“These are three men who represent the three pillars of American life that people have lost trust in over the past 15 years,” the musical’s creator Nova Bradford tells me. She’s referring to healthcare, Hollywood, and Big Tech. “Symbolically, we’re telling a story about America’s relationship to these institutions through the story of these three individuals in prison.”
The plot is loosely about the three famous inmates planning a prison escape, but it’s really a critique about society’s relationship with celebrity worship, with commentary about the for-profit healthcare industry woven in. The script hides serious moral and ethical conversations about fame, political violence, and powerful institutions amongst jokes about hashbrowns. It talks about why we, as a culture, venerate certain people, as well as looking at the cultural response to different high-profile criminals and suspects. It does so without taking itself too seriously, marrying commentary with over-the-top satire, including a romantic relationship between Diddy and Bankman-Fried and a running joke where Mangione writes in his diary, singing, “Dear Manifesto.” Just when there are emotional moments of sincerity about healthcare denials causing bankruptcy and even death, the tone shifts with a joke about fan girls sending Mangione their underwear.
“It doesn’t matter what you’re famous for, it just matters that you’re famous,” Diddy’s character (played by Chine Ikoro) tells Mangione (played by Mike Cefalo).
“People are addicted to being angry and scared — so if you’re doing something to keep them that way, they’ll make you go viral,” continues fictional Diddy. He advises fictional Mangione to stay famous by feeding the public simple stories they can understand, offering them a hero and a villain. At one point, the musical jokes about President Donald Trump pardoning Diddy and Sam Bankman-Fried (played by co-writer Andre Margatini). (Ironically, this same week Bankman-Fried has signaled he’d like a presidential pardon.)
Bradford said she had been thinking of doing a musical about Diddy and Bankman-Fried incarcerated together, and was further inspired once she saw the polarizing public respond to Mangione’s arrest. “The way the public’s response seemed to be divided didn’t seem to fall across existing political polarization,” Bradford says. “It didn’t seem to be aligning with other fault lines that I am accustomed to looking for. As a satirist, that was an interesting subject that caused me to think, ‘What’s going on here?’”
She says a common misconception from people is that the show is celebrating Mangione. “This show is very explicitly neither pro nor anti [Mangione],” Bradford says. “Or it’s perhaps more accurate to say that it’s both pro and anti. We’re engaging with all of the types of responses that the audience might be having, so the goal is that, regardless of someone’s existing opinions on the subject matter, they will see the show and find that their perspective is both reflected and also challenged.”
One of the moments in the musical that caused the most laughter and claps from the audience was the final song, which mocks the idea of using violence as a form of protest rather than joining a movement or focusing on policy.
Mangione’s character takes off his shirt while singing, “The world has a lot of inequality / so I’ll wreak some bloody violence ‘til there’s harmony / Every single human being’s life has worth / that’s why I’ll shoot everybody ‘til there’s peace on Earth.”
The musical is still a work in progress, Bradford and her co-writers and composer hope to eventually turn the play into a full-fledged production in New York City. They’ve done readings in San Francisco, where they are based, and a festival in Scotland, as a way to test interest. The troupe was surprised by the media explosion around the show’s announcement.
Before the musical even opened, it was being discussed by Stephen Colbert and Bill Maher, and they were on the front page of an Icelandic newspaper. “Part of the motivation for wanting to write the show was seeing the media circus that happened around the [Mangione] case and thinking about virality, why this happens, the news cycle’s focus on violence, and then before the show even opened we found ourselves at the center of the very phenomenon we sought to critique.”
Waiting outside of the show this week were supporters of Mangione, holding a large “Free Luigi! Free Us All!!!” banner. These supporters are often regulars at Mangione’s hearing, and handed out stickers advocating for jury nullification as well as a mock playbill with information they’d put together about Mangione’s legal cases. The playbill accused the musical of prejudicing potential future jurors, telling readers, “The musical you are attending tonight is part of the problem.” Outside of the venue there were mock musical posters plastered on the wall, advertising a “This is Not Luigi Musical” which “featured an illegal search and seizure, prejudicial perp walk and leaked evidence.” A note on the bottom of the posters said they were to “raise awareness of the rights violations” involved in Mangione’s case.
Opening night of the New York City-staged reading was two days before Mangione’s state hearing. On Wednesday, Judge Gregory Carro unsealed a notice that had been previously filed by Mangione’s defense team, revealing that they may use a psychiatric defense in the New York state murder case against him. If used, the psychiatric defense would have claimed Mangione acted under “extreme emotional disturbance” in the shooting of Thompson. However, on Thursday, Mangione’s team abruptly withdrew their notice, leaving their plan for his defense unclear.
Bradford hopes that the musical will remind the audience about the relationship between art and politics. “I hope that this can be part of a broader push to demonstrate that art, including musical theater, is still political, still current, and can still be challenging in the way that it entertains and pushes its audience,” she says. “I hope that this is opening people’s minds to the fact that satire is alive and well within the theater world.
“Art and politics have always been intertwined from the very beginning,” adds Cefalo, the actor playing Mangione. “Neither could exist without the other, and I think that this show shines a spotlight on that very sentiment.”
Cefalo says it was a strange experience playing a real person who the public feels like they know but who hasn’t spoken publicly.
“I’m navigating the fact that audience members are walking into our show with a fully-loaded version already in their minds, coupled with the reality that we have yet to really hear a word from Luigi himself,” Cefalo says. “Part of the job is almost holding all that projection without playing to it … I’m playing a person in a very specific moment before the country decided what he meant. The character in this musical is the guy at the center of the storm, not the outcome of it.”








Abu Asada, the current-day star of calisthenics, has built a cultlike following with his high-energy videos. Jason Motlagh
Weighted pushups on a bar are a staple of battles. “The bars don’t lie” goes one old-school mantra. Jason Motlagh
“In the world of calisthenics, the world is your gym,” one Houston-based battler says, “so you can get it in anywhere.” Jason Motlagh
Abu Asada (center, standing) with competitors in Houston. “He really opened eyes to life-or-death [training],” says one athlete. Jason Motlagh

Marshall Sampson celebrates his win surrounded by a raucous crowd in Brooklyn, New York. Sacha Lecca
An exhausted Sampson post-battle. “Pressure exposes everyone,” Abu Asada says. Sacha Lecca
The crowd cheers on the Calisthenic Prince, who calls himself a “bar magician,” during a battle in Brooklyn. Sacha Lecca
The Prince and a competitor called Xtra Money go head-to-head on dips. Sacha Lecca
The warriors take to the bar for muscle-ups. “This is the most physical thing you’re gonna see people do without being violent,” Abu Asada says.Sacha Lecca
Xtra Money cranking out 75 goblet squats with a 65-pound dumbbell. Sacha Lecca
The Prince accepts defeat in what Abu Asada calls “the most hostile even I’ve ever been a part of.” Sacha Lecca

Fans cheer in the streets of Port-au-Prince on Nov. 18, 2025 as Haiti celebrates qualifying for the World Cup.
January 29 / PlayStation 5 and Windows
February 27 / Nintendo Switch 2, Playstation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
March 3 / Windows
March 5 / PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
March 5 / Nintendo Switch 2
April 10 / Windows
April 14 / Nintendo Switch, Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
April 16 / Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
April 17 / Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
April 21 / Nintendo Switch, Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
April 23 / macOS and Windows
April 28 / PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Windows, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X|S
April 30 / PlayStation 5
May 7 / Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
May 19 / Windows and Xbox Series X|S
May 21 / Windows
May 21 / Nintendo Switch 2 Nintendo
May 22 / PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
May 27 / PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S
May 29 / Linux, macOS, Nintendo Switch, Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X|S

We’ve Been Thinking About Animal Sexuality All Wrong
I want to take you back to the year 2008, when New York City’s Museum of Sex launched an exhibit on the sex lives of animals. The exhibit ran for a full decade, and I had the chance to check it out about a year or so before it closed in 2018. The Sex Lives of Animals exhibit is, in fact, where I learned that ducks possess massive, corkscrew-like penises. But duck genitalia aside, the Museum of Sex’s intention, nearly 20 years ago, was to reveal the “astonishing array” of sexual behaviors animals routinely engage in, from kissing to hugging to, well, everything else. And definitely not always male-on-female.
As many props as I give the Museum of Sex for teaching me so much about what goes in broad daylight among the literal birds and bees, I also have to acknowledge what a bummer it is that such an exhibit would probably not be permitted in a place where they don’t sell vibrators and lube in the gift shop. And how disappointing it is that the truth about cats and dogs, if you will, has not become more widely accepted.
When it comes to the gender and sexuality of animals, the truth is not only out there — it’s actually been staring us in the face for years. The problem is, mainstream science and society have been slow to move away from the narrative that all animals copulate only for reproduction, any same-sex activity is purely anomalous (and unnatural), and every species is male-dominated. Now, a new documentary called Second Nature: Gender & Sexuality in the Animal World is working to dispel those myths — and, ideally, popularize them to a greater extent.
Narrated by Elliot Page, Second Nature more than does its homework by interviewing a handful of in-the-know scientists who have built lengthy careers studying the diversity of sex and gender behaviors of a range of species, from primates and birds to fish and reptiles. And there certainly is a lot to unpack. In addition to the facts themselves, Second Nature asks a few important questions: Why isn’t this information taught in basic biology classes or included in zoo books? Why do humans insist on projecting their own binary narrative of gender and sexuality — that males are aggressors, females are coy, and sex is only for procreation — onto our animals neighbors?
The answer is pretty simple: in order to understand the world around us, the easiest and simplest thing to do is to apply our societal framework. Historically speaking, those who research and study animals are prone to projecting their ciscentric, patriarchal ideas into animals, despite lots of evidence to the contrary.
Anyway, now that I’ve watched Second Nature, I can rattle off some very cool facts: Dolphins have homosexual sex — a lot — as do penguins and black swans. Also regarding penguins, those seabirds frequently form pair bonds of the same sex to parent little penguin chicks. Bonobo females frequently use sex to resolve conflicts via “genital rubbing,” and males can have sex with each other via “penis fencing.” Bonobos also operate in a matriarchal society. About half of the sex capuchin monkeys have is homosexual.
Speaking of those crazy-dicked ducks, get this: Female ducks possess vaginas with two to three pouches that may lead nowhere; beyond the pouches lies a labyrinthian spiral. When ducks mate, it’s the female who decides which male she’ll allow to deposit sperm in the spiral, but that’s only if she decides to relax her muscles enough. If and when a male duck tries to force himself on a female — and that definitely happens — her vaginal pouches actually prevent the sperm from getting anywhere.
What else? Well, female golden lion tamarins have harems of unrelated males, all of whom she mates with. And I think we all are pretty familiar with the tale of the seahorse, where males become pregnant and give birth.
A lot of this information initially found an audience in Dr. Joan Roughgarden’s 2004 book Evolution’s Rainbow, which looked at evidence from birds, fish, and mammals to push back against the Darwinian sexual selection theory, which proposed that male-male competition, or intrasexual selection, was a method for successful mating. (Basically, the strongest and most aggressive male gets to mate and pass on their genes.) Charles Darwin also proposed that intersexual selection involved females evaluating and choosing males with whom to mate based on specific traits, such as a colorful peacock plumage.
When Roughgarden, a Stanford evolutionary biologist who is prominently featured in Second Nature, argued against these long-accepted Darwinian theories, she was met with some horrific pushback. The reviews were “nasty,” she recalls in the documentary. Other reviews said that there was a “gay agenda” at work. (Dr. Roughgarden is a trans woman.)
We tend to forget that in Victorian England, when Darwin first proposed the theory of evolution, religious leaders weren’t having it. Generally speaking, religious leaders in the 1800s resisted Darwinism because they felt it contradicted the Genesis creation story (though some were comfortable with the idea of Christian Darwinism, which proposes that God utilized biological evolution to create all life). Catholic leadership felt Darwinism could explain physical biology but threatened the existence of unique human souls. Ultimately, leaders in Christianity felt Darwinism reduced human life to something purely mechanical and soulless, and therefore Godless.
It wouldn’t be until the 1870s — nearly two decades after Darwin published On The Origin of Species — that the scientific community and other educated groups widely accepted evolution as fact.
In Second Nature, scientists theorize that Darwin couldn’t help but impose his own heterosexual ideations on animal reproduction, mainly that animals only copulate for the purposes of reproduction, with males being the aggressors and females fluttering their eyelids behind lace fans, or something.
In more recent years, as the scientific community became more diverse, there came a fresh wave of observations about animal behavior and the evolutionary reasons behind them. For instance, social animals like bonobos and chimpanzees use sex as a means of reconciliation, which allows for a peaceful, cooperative existence. (If sex were primarily achieved through aggression, that would probably result in more volatility, injuries, and death, which doesn’t sound ideal for any community’s survival — animal, human, or otherwise.)
“Humans project ourselves onto nature all the time, and have been doing it forever — just look at any myth,” Second Nature director Drew Denny tells Rolling Stone. “We love creating colorful explanations for natural phenomena, but often do so at the peril of totally innocent people. Remember when all left-handed people were controlled by Satan? I bet you know several lefties who are not, in fact, Satanists.”
Denny thinks it would benefit all of us to take a bird’s eye view (pun intended) of history and remember the myriad stories we’ve told each other over the years in an attempt to explain the unexplainable. If humans and our inventions are inherently fallible, then it’s reasonable to figure that our stories are too. “Our little projections — even our longest standing myths — are nothing compared to the billions of years of evolution that have led us to this moment,” Denny says.
Of course, animals don’t really need us to understand the full spectrum of their gender and sexual experiences — they’re all doing just fine living their lives, fencing penises, same-sex pair bonding, and changing sexes in order to preserve their existence. Really, by peddling outdated narratives about the way animals relate to each other will only hurt one species: our own.