Skip to content
Search

In 2016, We Already Knew How Bad This Would Get

As social media fills up with pictures from a decade ago, nostalgia isn't hitting quite the way it used to.

In 2016, We Already Knew How Bad This Would Get
Charles Ommanney/The Washington Post/Getty Images

With the arrival of each new year, we are compelled to reflect in dreadful wonder on the distance we have journeyed through time. It is strange that our lives, up to the present moment, are part of history, and that we keep moving forward into it. There is something important to be understood, it seems, by unearthing our own near past and feeling almost alienated from it: Was I really that person, ignorant of all that would happen between then and now? In another city, in love with someone else? Wearing those clothes?

And so our entry into 2026 has occasioned the traditional visit to the photo archives. The navel-gazing aspect of social media turns this impulse into a communal phenomenon, everyone pulling out their 2016 pictures to gain some perspective on a decade that may have gone quickly, but felt endless as we endured it. Some remember their challenges in that era, others their triumphs — and still more express what they hadn’t known about themselves back then, how their identity was evolving.


The wrinkle in this case is that many remember 2016 both as a hellish tragedy and the last gasp of anything like normality. For the United States (and, unfortunately, the rest of the world), the election of Donald Trump, thanks to a rising tide of far-right extremism, guaranteed geopolitical instability, economic chaos, and viciously anti-humanitarian praxis for a generation to come. “I think there’s so much attention on looking back at 2016 because things lowkey fell off a cliff in this country there after,” wrote one X user this week, expressing the trepidatious kind of nostalgia seen all over the timeline of late. Indeed, people have presented their innocent old selfies as if they’re portraits of someone about to be hit by a bus.

But we should give ourselves credit for seeing what awaited us in 2017 and beyond. We knew during the election that whether he won or not, Trump’s viability as a candidate was a very bad sign. We groaned when Hillary Clinton told us to “Pokémon Go to the polls,” realizing that her struggle to connect with voters made her vulnerable as Trump perfected his vulgar performance of populist bromides. The Republican candidate was no mystery, a sleazy tabloid character since the 1970s, and the warnings about what his presidency would look like — including from GOP leadership that later bent the knee to the MAGA movement — have proved remarkably prescient. Few outside the field of epidemiology might have predicted a disaster such as the Covid-19 pandemic, yet the garish renovations to the White House, brazen corruption, coziness with dictators, gutting of federal institutions, and deployment of masked goons against the U.S. population are all in line with what the doomsayers had said.

Which is really what makes those 2016 photos so poignant. Even then, we sensed a better future slipping through our fingers, and fretted that all we took for granted was about to be demolished by lawless, reactionary forces. This was a year commonly referred to as “the worst year ever” by those eager to turn the page despite the widespread expectation of heightened misery ahead. The pangs we get from glimpses of it today are reminders that we were already hanging on by a thread.

I began that pivotal year by moving across the country to Los Angeles, a sprawling metropolis unfamiliar to me. In short order, my long-term relationship unraveled, I quit my job to work for a meager hourly wage at a bookstore, and I moved into the back room of a slovenly shared house routinely circled by helicopters. I didn’t like suddenly treading water right after turning 30, but because the chaos was of my own making, I told myself I could manage.

What I couldn’t deal with was watching America come apart at the seams. I’ll never forget spotting a man in a Trump shirt at my favorite taco truck — a co-founder of Latinos for Trump had recently gone on TV to scare viewers by proclaiming that unchecked immigration from Mexico would lead to “taco trucks on every corner” — and realizing that I had no idea which way was up. On election night, I took an Uber home from a friend’s house, and the driver, noting my depressive fugue, told me that the outcome was meaningless, since the Rothschild banking family controls the government anyway. That comment was a special preview of the conspiracist madness that has flourished under Trump.

Maybe, then, 2016 is the year we finally lost touch with reality. Fake news and viral misinformation became QAnon and election denial and eventually deepfakes and state-disseminated AI slop. We can study our decade-younger faces and find people not numbed to this stuff, who might actually believe that everyone can agree upon certain basic facts. They are anxious and afraid, to be sure, but have tried to convince themselves that reason will survive. And maybe it can, in a society that outlasts Trump and seeks to reverse the profound damage he has wrought.

That hope is weaker than ever, a guttering flame, so it hurts to recall that we once relied upon it from day to day. But if we were also remarkably clear-eyed about where the years after 2016 would take us, then we at least have the ability to envision a path out of this dark age. You can pity your former self for what they’ll have to go through, or you can borrow their strength. Whatever the cost, they made it to 2026.

More Stories

We Are Witnessing the Imperial Presidency on Steroids
Joe Raedle/Getty Images; Steve Northup/Getty Images

We Are Witnessing the Imperial Presidency on Steroids

During the last period of his time as president, while the Watergate scandal was raging, Richard Nixon allegedly told several U.S. representatives that he could get on the telephone, issue an order, and soon after millions of people would be killed. It wasn’t hyperbole. There are very few people in human history that have ever had that kind of power, and most have been American presidents. But how does one individual with this sort of authority exist in a system of government designed with a triad of co-equal branches set up specifically to thwart concentrated executive power, a system where starting a war wasn’t even an executive-branch power in the constitutional design?

The question of what in our system could have prevented Nixon from causing a nuclear holocaust if he wanted to has been left unanswered. There have been rumors that Cabinet secretaries at the time were telling aides to ignore such a presidential order if it were issued, but that’s a stop-gap measure, not a constitutional check. The designers of our republican system never intended their chief executive to have this sort of authority. The fact that presidents do today is the root cause of many of our national problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Trump Administration’s Lies Insult the Intelligence of Every American
Octavio Jones/AFP/Getty Images

The Trump Administration’s Lies Insult the Intelligence of Every American

We are being told by the Trump administration that an intensive care nurse, Alex Jeffrey Pretti, and a mom of three, Renee Nicole Good, both gunned down by ICE agents in Minnesota, are a new breed of homegrown terrorist. You can see video of both incidents and judge for yourself the grotesque absurdity of these claims. Or you could take the word of the resident Renfield of the White House, Stephen Miller, who took to social media and called Pretti “a would-be assassin” who “tried to murder federal law enforcement.”

Videos of Pretti’s horrific killing, shot from multiple angles, show six or seven agents wrestling a passive Pretti to the ground. When they discover a gun on his body, one of the agents appears to disarm Pretti, and then another shoots him four times in the back. A third agent also fires into his body. Shooting a subdued man in the back is the very definition of excessive force and cowardice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump is going to have a hard time winning on Iran

Iranians gather while blocking a street during a protest in Tehran, Iran on Jan. 9, 2026.

MAHSA/MIDDLE EAST IMAGES/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Trump is going to have a hard time winning on Iran

President Donald Trump’s promise that “help is on its way” for anti-government protesters in Iran appears to be increasingly at odds with realities on the ground, and the administration’s desire for an easy foreign policy win — or regime change in Tehran — remains elusive.

As large-scale protests have gained momentum in Iran amid a near-total information blackout, fragmentary evidence indicates the demonstrations have been crushed in a bloody crackdown by Iran’s security forces.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does Trump have a plan for Venezuela?
ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES

Does Trump have a plan for Venezuela?

When Americans awoke on Saturday to learn the United States had invaded Venezuela and kidnapped its president, they likely expected their nation’s elected officials to offer an explanation about why we had done this.

After months of military buildup and activity in the Caribbean, it wasn’t a surprise that the U.S. had finally decided to embark on a crusade to bring down Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. What was stupefying was that America’s latest regime-change operation was apparently designed to leave the regime intact.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Year of Media Capture

Donald Trump speaks to members of press aboard Air Force One

Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images

Trump’s Year of Media Capture

This was the year when public broadcasting was gutted and hyper-partisans prospered, when the First Amendment was exhaustively praised and opportunistically abandoned. It was the year when media capture came to America.

Before 2025, “media capture” was a term used exclusively overseas, describing the compromise of a free press to curry favor with the regime in power. Sometimes this happened through threats and intimidation, greased by partisan group think. Other times, the cudgel was money: wealthy administration allies would buy independent news organizations and neuter them to fall in line with the state-backed version of facts.

Keep ReadingShow less