Even before Donald Trump addressed the press in the aftermath of a shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, large swaths of the online right had decided on a course for messaging: The shooting proves why the president’s potentially unlawful White House ballroom project must be completed.
It’s a nonsensical line of reasoning. For starters, the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is not an event organized or hosted by the White House — the president attends as an invited guest. On top of that, the planned ballroom would only fit about half the guests of the dinner, which can boast upwards of 2,000 guests. Even amid reports that Secret Service security was more relaxed than in previous years, the agency’s protocols worked to neutralize the gunman. It should also go without saying that the president regularly leaves 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to attend public events, and remaining cloistered in the complex at all times is not an option.
Yet, dozens of high profile conservative commentators responded to the shooting by demanding the ballroom be embraced.
Those figures included Meghan McCain, the daughter of former Arizona senator and presidential nominee John McCain; Jack Posobiec, a prominent ethnonationalist conspiracy theorist turned White House stenographer; LIbs of TikTok, the anti-trans, anti-LGBTQ hate account run by Chaya Raichik; and a slew of other accounts boasting collective millions of followers posted basically the same message.
A few hours after the shooting, Trump appeared in the White House press briefing room and all but made the talking point official. “I didn’t want to say this, but this is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we’re planning at the White House. It’s actually a larger room and it’s much more secure. It’s drone proof. It’s bulletproof glass. We need the ballroom,” Trump said. “That’s why Secret Service, that’s why the military are demanding it. They’ve wanted the ballroom for 150 years for lots of different reasons.”
In a subsequent Truth Social post, the president wrote that “this event would never have happened with the Militarily Top Secret Ballroom currently under construction at the White House. It cannot be built fast enough,” and called for an ongoing lawsuit to block the construction of the structure to be dismissed.
And that really cuts at the crux of the matter. Trump’s ballroom — and much of the self-aggrandizing renovations and projects he’s been forcing onto Washington, D.C. — are noncompliant with federal laws and regulations governing construction on public buildings.
Trump tore down the East Wing of the White House after initially claiming it would not be harmed by his ballroom project. The demolition took place without the approval or review of the National Capital Planning Commission, the congressionally authorized executive agency which oversees federal construction. The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued the administration twice in response.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon put a temporary stop on construction, writing that the president could resume his plans as soon as Congress “blesses this project through statutory authorization.”
“The President may at any time go to Congress to obtain express authority to construct a ballroom and to do so with private funds,” Leon wrote, as the legislative branch retained “authority over the nation’s property and its oversight of government spending.” A D.C. appeals court allowed construction to resume while the administration challenges the ruling, but in the aftermath of the shooting, Trump’s Department of Justice is outright attempting to bully the National Trust for Historic Preservation into dropping their lawsuit — accusing them of placing the president’s very life in danger by challenging him.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blache wrote in a Sunday letter to the attorneys representing the trust that “the White House ballroom is essential for the safety and security of the President, his family, his cabinet, and his staff. When the White House ballroom is complete, President Trump and his successors will no longer need to venture beyond the safety of the White House perimeter to attend large gatherings at the Washington Hilton ballroom.”
“Put simply, your lawsuit puts the lives of the President, his family, and his staff at grave risk,” Blanche added. “I hope yesterday’s narrow miss will help you finally realize the folly of a lawsuit that literally serves no purpose except to stop President Trump no matter the cost.”
They’re seemingly enlisting the help of lawmakers and influencers to get it done. Several social media users and outlets noted the swarm of right-wing influencers who posted demands for the ballroom’s completion within minutes of each other — and using nearly identical language. Accusations of a coordinated messaging campaign between the users and the White House circulated online.
Prominent lawmakers on Capitol Hill have also joined the chorus. House Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News on Monday that the ballroom will be “a solution” to whatever problem the president imagines he is solving. “It’ll have seven-inch thick glass, so it’ll be a very safe environment to do events like that. We need a place like that and the president keeps pointing it out.” The House Speaker seems uninterested in actually exerting the approval power of Congress, as doing so would mean recognizing that the president has been operating illegally on this and a half dozen other projects for months.
There are a myriad of reasons why the claims being made about the ballroom’s necessity are exaggerated, but in the context of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, the First Amendment implications cannot be discounted. The dinner takes place outside of the White House because, at least in its conception, it is supposed to highlight the independence of the press. They decide the venue, the guest list, the speakers, and the president attends and (ideally) subjects himself to some good-humored roasting. Placing the dinner — and other events like it — within the confines of the White House would inherently give the president and his staff far more control over who can attend, what they can say, and whether or not it takes place at all.
For an administration already obsessed with controlling how the press covers them, and punishing those whose coverage they do not like, it’s a dream come true.
Siri worked out of Dr. Mehmet Oz’s (right) home in an unofficial role on Kennedy’s transition.Brendan SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey has aimed to allow parents a religious exemption to school vaccinations.West Virginia Governor’s Office
Health Secretary Kennedy served as co-counsel with Siri in 2018.Jim WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
Firefighters work to extinguish a fire at an office building in Kyiv following a Russian strike on Sept. 23, 2026.Kostiantyn Liberov/Libkos/Getty Images
NYPD officers detain Susan Sarandon and pro-Palestinian demonstrators near the United Nations, ahead of Benjamin Netanyahu’s address, on Sept. 24, 2026.CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP/Getty Images
The first day of the 2026 Republican National Convention at the American Airlines Center, on Sept. 9, 2026 in Dallas, Texas.
People of all colors listen as Donald Trump speaks on the first day of the Republican midterm convention.
Trump supporters at the Republican midterm convention.
Donald Trump looks to an image of Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed during a campaign rally on Sunday, Oct. 25, 2026, in Port Huron, Mich.
Republicans Are Driving the Most Racist Election Cycle in a Generation
In 2010, a splinter group of far-right Republicans known as the Tea Party summoned a red wave of Republican voters in Barack Obama’s first midterm elections, capitalizing on the remnants of the global financial crisis and troop surges in Afghanistan to help the GOP win 63 seats in Congress. The Tea Party wanted to be known as fiscal conservatives, but their darkest power was abject, open fury that the United States had dared to elect a Black man as president.
But 2010 was not, somehow, the most racist election in recent memory. It’s the 2026 midterms, thanks to the invective spewed by the man in the White House and the worst dregs of his movement around the country. With a war in Iran, skyrocketing gas prices, rampant inflation, and a burgeoning housing crisis, the GOP has no claim to fiscal conservatism this election cycle. Instead, all they have is race.
“There’s five hundred million Arabs in the world,” Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said recently. “And yet they don’t produce science. They don’t win the Nobel Prize. They don’t win the Fields Prize. They don’t win the Wolf Prize. They don’t produce literature.”
RFK was making a barely veiled reference to the primary target of Republican racism this cycle: Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed. El-Sayed is a muslim, and is sufficiently left wing so as to invite the ire of basically every faction of American politics, including centrist Democrats, centrist Republicans, and the far right, who have taken up the cause of cutting him down with particular zeal. Trump has joined in:
“If Abdul and the Democrats win, they will open the floodgates and invite hordes of jihadis to our shores, creating a nightmare of violence and terror until you cannot even have a Christmas,” Trump said at a rally in Port Huron on Sunday.
Trump has repeatedly issued some of the worst attacks against El-Sayed, repeating the claim that he is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and calling him a “jihadist.” He has also gleefully mocked El-Sayed’s name at multiple campaign stops, and said over the weekend that he would “be the only senator that has to go through a metal detector before he is allowed to go in the Senate,” the implication, of course, being that he is a potential terrorist.
Vice President JD Vance, not one to be out-done, accused El-Sayed of “anti-white” racism, a familiar line of attack by members of the far right looking to mobilize economically disadvantaged white voters.
“Abdul El-Sayed, who maybe more than any Democrat running in the nation has engaged in the kind of explicitly anti-white racial hatred that has become common in the Democratic Party,” Vance said at a rally in Michigan on Tuesday. “I’d say that person should not be elected.”
The attacks on El-Sayed are shocking and crude, but they didn’t spring out of a vacuum. Racist dogwhistles — and more explicit attacks — have been common fodder for the GOP for decades, from Ronald Reagan’s popularization of the term “welfare queen” — a veiled attack on impoverished Black Americans — to Trump’s support of the Barack Obama birth certificate conspiracies. Some of Trump’s earliest political breakthroughs came on the back of demonizing Latin American immigrants and painting undocumented migrants as a boogeyman threatening the livelihoods of “real” Americans.
All these threads have come together in the second Trump administration, with the persecution of Haitian immigrants who were stripped of their Temporary Protected Status by the Department of Homeland Security, a campaign of terror across the heartland committed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, repeated denigration of African countries in public speeches, and constant racist dogwhistles in official government communications. The Trump administration has raided the home of a sitting congresswoman, Somali-American Representative Ilhan Omar, reportedly as part of an investigation aiming to strip her of her citizenship. Trump has repeatedly suggested Omar should be deported, while making fun of her head coverings.
Trump’s racism has spread throughout the GOP, emboldening the most fringe candidates to take positions so blatantly bigoted that some squeamish members of their party are cringing. In Texas, Railroad Commissioner candidate Bo French recently doubled down on a racist post he made remarking on the number of Indian-American students at a recent University of Texas football game. Republican megadonor Elon Musk, a white South African born and raised under apartheid, has spent entire months this year posting incessantly about race, repeatedly returning to racist tropes to attack Democratic candidates as he pours money into attack ads in several states.
This kind of animus is the sign of a desperate party — one whose own consultants are already admitting might be “fucked.” The idea they’re selling to American voters is simple: Hate your neighbor, based not on what they say or do, but because of who they are. The problem is, most of their enemies are just as American as their marks, and no amount of rhetoric can cover up the fact that they’re here to stay.