After more than a decade of building a career in electronic music, Whipped Cream arrives at a point she describes with unusual certainty. Her debut album Home Was Always Me, released April 30 via Monstercat, is a 14-track record she spent years working on. Over a video call from her home on Vancouver Island, she returns to the same idea in slightly different ways: this is the first time a project has felt fully resolved to her.
“Just saying it out loud got me really excited for some reason, I’m so excited to drop it. I've never done anything so big in my life. I played Coachella, I've done Lollapalooza, I've done some really cool things in my life. Releasing such a big body of work is definitely one of my biggest accomplishments yet”, she says.
The title Home Was Always Me took her a while to get to. At different stages, she considered other options, like It’s Time to Go Home or Cream World, each pointing toward a different emotional framing of the same material. One suggests departure, the other a kind of self-contained universe. The final title arrived late, but it anchored the entire record in a way she says immediately felt right.
“Home is like being in flow” says the 28 year-old artist. “Life is by no means easy for anyone. And I think we all feel pain and we all feel pleasure and we all bleed. I think that you're in this one body, in this lifetime and just being present and whatever's happening in the world around, you are your home. You are your structure, and it's important to remember that we are our own foundation, nothing else externally creates who we are.”
HOME WAS ALWAYS ME
That idea sits underneath the entire album. It shapes how she thinks about identity, especially after years of navigating an industry that constantly reshapes artists through expectation, projection, and comparison.
That sense of internal structure becomes more meaningful when placed against the backdrop of how the album was made. Our first interview took place in Milan last February, during a moment that connected back to her past in a different way.
Before music, and long before she became Whipped Cream, Caroline Cecil was a competitive figure skater. An injury put an early end to her dream of one day representing Canada at the Olympics. That forced break from the ice did, however, provide her with the free time to put her creativity to good use in other ways. She hunkered down in her room and taught herself how to produce, eventually gaining a sizeable following on SoundCloud thanks to her Jersey club remixes.
The transition from ice to stage is not something she frames as a clean break, but there is a continuity in how she talks about performance, discipline, and repetition. Months later, speaking from Vancouver Island, the environment is quieter, but the reflection is more internalized. The album is finished, and she is now living with the version of herself that made it.
Sonically, Home Was Always Me operates within the language of electronic music, but it resists being reduced to genre expectations. There are tracks designed for movement and club settings, but they sit alongside more reflective material that carries a different emotional weight. She is aware of how electronic music is often categorized through energy and impact, but her interest lies in what can exist inside that framework when intention shifts.
“My narrative… is just through intent and my story and kind of seeing the depth in things and the beauty and melancholic things and turning my own suffering and pain into art,” she says. That approach does not reject the physicality of dance music, but it does complicate it. The album is structured in a way that allows contrast to exist without resolution, where heavier moments do not cancel out quieter ones, and emotional tone is not flattened for consistency.
Part of what allows her to work this way is the fact that she is entirely self-taught. Her entry into production did not come through formal training or structured education, but through long periods of experimentation, failure, and repetition. She often describes this process as learning by doing, with early years spent breaking down songs, pausing, rewinding, and rebuilding ideas from fragments.
“When you’re self-taught, you figure it out but there’s also no walls,” she says. That absence of structure becomes a defining part of her workflow. Without institutional boundaries dictating what is correct, she developed a process that relies heavily on instinct and curiosity. It also meant that mistakes were part of the foundation rather than deviations from it.
At the same time, she acknowledges the trade-offs. Technical training can provide tools and precision that she had to develop gradually on her own. But she also points to how too much structure can limit experimentation. In her experience, knowing exactly how something is supposed to be done can sometimes make it harder to explore how else it might be done.
That openness has shaped a body of work that moves across genres more fluidly than it adheres to any single identity. While she is primarily known for electronic music, she has explored elements of pop, hip-hop, and more recently, ideas that extend into country-inspired material she is still developing. For her, this is not about diversification for its own sake, but about following different impulses as they appear.
Over time, that approach has also put her in contact with the noise of external input. Early in her career, she received advice to delay making a full album, a decision that influenced the timing of her debut more than she initially realized. Looking back now, she sees how easily outside perspectives can shape decisions that feel practical in the moment but become more complicated over time.

“I wish that I listened to myself more. If you ever are wondering what to do, just go back to the why on why you started. And that thing you’re saying yes to or no to, does it align with why you started?” she says. For her, it’s less about rejecting collaboration or guidance, and more about checking whether decisions still connect to the original reason she began making music.
That tension between external influence and internal direction runs through the broader context of Home Was Always Me. The album carries traces of a long period of development where ideas were shaped, reshaped, and eventually pared down into a final form.
Looking ahead, she is already thinking about how the music will exist outside the studio. A live show is in development, designed to bring the emotional range of the album into a performance setting that still retains the energy of her DJ sets. She has previously performed at major festivals including Coachella, Lollapalooza, and Tomorrowland, but she describes this next phase as an opportunity to reframe how audiences engage with the new material.
At its core, Home Was Always Me reflects a shift in how she understands authorship and identity. The process of making it has brought her to a place where decisions feel more directly connected to intent, without needing constant negotiation with outside expectations.
“If everybody likes you, then you’re not being authentically yourself,” she says, having learned it the hard way. The work stands as a record of where she is now, shaped by years of trial, doubt, instinct, and adjustment, but grounded in something she describes with increasing clarity: the idea that the structure she has been looking for was always within her.













Those small opportunities became part of the festival’s identity: a place where established acts and future stars could exist side by side. That philosophy remains central to the festival’s return. While Warped Tour’s biggest names will draw crowds, Lyman believes the real magic has always happened away from the main stages.
Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny in a split image
Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny Dealt With Trump Quietly. It’s a Smart Move
Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny are both major superstars — and they’ve shared some parallels in their careers and discographies for several years. Now, they’re even using the same playbook to deal with taunts and baiting from Donald Trump and the White House’s social media teams.
Since Trump took office during his second term, he and his administration have been using social media as part of their communication strategy. The propaganda-like, rage-bait-style clips often lean into internet culture and use popular music to make light of Trump’s most egregious actions, like his immigration policy and war-hungry foreign policy.
Olivia Rodrigo, Katy Perry, Ariana Grande, and Noah Kahan are just some of the artists who have had their music used in these videos without their permission — and vehemently spoken out against these actions and against the president. In the past couple of weeks, the Trump administration seems to have wanted to provoke a response from two of the world’s biggest superstars: Bad Bunny and Swift.
On July 30, the official White House TikTok used “La Mudanza” for a particularly tone-deaf video about immigration that celebrated the number of deportations under Trump. A week later, a video with text that said, “mood because it’s August and Donald Trump is your president” set to Swift’s “August” was uploaded by Team Trump, the president’s official campaign account. The caption was an overt provocation: “I’m sure Taylor Swift is going to be super excited we used her song,” it read. Days later, another clip from the same account featured an edited version of Swift’s Red album cover with text that said, “Did you know that Taylor Swift wrote a whole album about the color of the Republican Party?”
Neither musician has released a public statement denouncing the use of their music in Trump’s videos. Instead, two of the world’s biggest superstars quietly removed their songs from videos posted by official accounts linked to the Trump administration. (It’s unclear if there is a TikTok feature that allows selective sound muting on videos or if the respective teams reached out to the social media accounts directly.) The tracks are still available for other TikTok accounts to use in their videos, making their silence a pointed — and smart — approach. Both Bad Bunny and Swift seem to recognize the president and his administration’s tactics for what they are: antagonizing moves that keep the Trump conversation centered on his social media presence, rather than his actual policies and the harm they commit. Why would they add their star power to the conversation and stoke the flames when that’s exactly what the White House appears to want?
Some people argue that celebrities should wield their platform to denounce Trump at any chance if they are truly not politically aligned with his MAGA politics. But because they hold so much influence, these superstars need to be strategic about how they use it.
Benito, in particular, has been incredibly outspoken about his politics. He stood on two of the world’s biggest stages and used them to voice pro-immigration messages, denounce Trump’s policies, and highlight Puerto Rico as it struggles with the effects of U.S. imperialism. “Before I say, ‘Thank God,’ I’m going to say, ‘ICE out,’” the Puerto Rican superstar said at the 2026 Grammys. “We’re not savage. We’re not animals. We’re not aliens. We are humans and we are Americans.” Last summer, Bad Bunny’s music video for “Nuevayol” used a voice that sounds a lot like the president’s to deliver a pro-immigrant message. “I made a mistake. I want to apologize to the immigrants in America. I mean the United States. I know America is the whole continent,” the voice bellows out of a Seventies radio toward the end of the video. “I want to say that this country is nothing without the immigrants.”
Fans were convinced that Benito would speak out against the official White House TikTok account when it used one of his most political songs. But commenting on the video would only blow up the discussion for a wider audience. When Rodrigo, Perry, Grande, and Kahan made public comments, spokespeople for the White House used the opportunity to spread hateful rhetoric. “We’ll say this one last time: what’s actually barbaric, inhumane, and heinous are the criminal illegal aliens who have injured and murdered innocent American citizens,” Abigail Jackson said in a statement to Rolling Stone after Grande spoke out. It’s the antithesis of what Benito said during his Grammys speech this year: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love.”
Swift, on the other hand, has dealt with Trump and the right-wing’s instigations for years, each one crazier than the last. The TikTok videos from the last week aren’t even the first time that the administration has used the singer’s music for social media videos. Last fall, both the official White House TikTok account and Team Trump used songs from Swift’s then-newly released The Life of a Showgirl in separate videos. One plucked the lyrics “pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes” from “The Fate of Ophelia” to celebrate Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and the first and second ladies. The others boasted about Trump by using “Father Figure” and honored Melania Trump’s Patriot of the Year award with “Opalite.” As of Aug. 10, the audio is not available under all of these specific videos.
The pop superstar has not spoken publicly about these instances. But she has made her disdain for Trump clear. Over the years, Swift has criticized Trump’s autocratic leadership. On X, she wrote “we will vote you out” and endorsed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the 2020 and 2024 elections, respectively. In 2019, Swift told Rolling Stone, “There’s literally nothing worse than white supremacy. It’s repulsive. There should be no place for it.”
Even though she’s shared her liberal viewpoints on issues like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and racial inequality, Swift has still faced ridiculous claims of being MAGA-aligned and folding in right-wing dog whistles to her music — and that’s without ever naming Trump. If Swift were to make a statement about her music being used by the Trump administration, the attention-seeking president would absolutely revel in it. Getting Swift and Bad Bunny to weigh in is exactly the type of headline grabber he would love to draw attention from his remarkably unpopular presidency.