Baby Nova created a universe where emotional honesty, theatrical instinct, and internet-age fragmentation all coexist.
Though she once trained in the physically demanding world of high-level circus performance, her music feels less rooted in spectacle than in exposure. Across her work, intimacy and discomfort sit side by side, with lyrics that move between confession, provocation, and self-interrogation. Rather than smoothing those tensions out, she leans into them, allowing contradictions to become part of the experience.
Her songs pull from vintage palettes and contemporary language, creating music that feels untethered from a single era while remaining deeply connected to the emotional realities of her generation. In conversation, she speaks openly about preserving ambiguity, protecting privacy within autobiographical writing, and rejecting the idea that art should always arrive fully explained.
You come from a background in intense physical performance. Has that changed the way you approach music compared to artists who haven’t performed in that way?
I’m assuming you mean my time doing Cirque. I will say it has not had an impact on my music career at all, and in fact I’ve lost most of those skills, minus juggling, which I can still do.
Cirque is the kind of thing you really have to keep up with or you lose the muscles required to do it. It’s a very different type of performance than music, although both at times feel like falling from the ceiling without a harness.
Do you see your music as an extension of your body, or more as a constructed version of yourself?
I see my music as more true to myself than perhaps my social personality. I’m very socially shy, so I tend to mask a lot or restrain my thoughts and feelings, whereas in my music I’m able to express myself more fully.
I have a trick when I’m writing where I’ll say, “Okay, so this happened. How does that make you feel?” I’ll write down my first answer, which is usually some bullshit answer about how I think I’m supposed to feel. Then I’ll ask, “Okay, but how do you actually feel?” It’s simple, but it’s helped me get more in tune with my unfiltered feelings.
I think the pursuit of honesty in music is so important because the songs that have been canon moments in my life are when the artist finally says the scary part out loud.
There’s a strong internet-era dimension in your themes. Do you feel like you’re creating from within that culture, or reacting to it?
I think it’s a mix. I’m less engaged in internet culture than a lot of people my age. I’m a little internet-averse, unfortunately. But it’s shaping language, and I like to talk in my songs the way I would in real life, so naturally the internet era bleeds through my writing.
Some of it is intentional, though. I pull a lot sonically from a Dusty in Memphis palette and more vintage-feeling sounds in general, so it was important to me that the music didn’t feel like a period piece. I consciously kept the lyrics contemporary.
Your songs often feel like fragments of a larger world. Are you consciously building a universe, or does that emerge naturally over time?
I think that naturally unfolds over time. I’m a very conceptually driven artist, but usually the concept finds itself. I’ll write most of the record, and the throughline will reveal itself somewhere toward the end.
A lot of emerging artists are pushed to simplify their work to scale faster. Do you feel pressure to make your music more legible, or is authenticity something you’re committed to keeping?
Yes. But I’m not listening to it and getting in a bit of trouble as a result.
I hear a lot of feedback like, “The lyric is just a little too provocative,” or “We don’t know where to put this.” But I take it as a compliment. I think it means I’m doing my job.
A lot of the artists I look up to were at some point considered not to have a clear category or genre, or were considered too provocative. I think that’s par for the course of creating something authentically you.
With an artistic identity so visually and conceptually defined, does it ever feel limiting, or does it give you a structure to push against?
Not so much. With every project cycle, there’s an opportunity to shift the visuals to match the record, and that’s exciting to me.
I used to stress all the time about the visuals and the music: “Does this record make sense with that record? Do these visuals feel like me?” Then I heard the best advice I’ve ever received, from a mentor of mine, Michael McCarty. He said, “Never underestimate yourself as the throughline of everything you do.”
From that point on, my only question became, “Do I like it, or do I not like it?” That was enough. I think it’s the most freeing sentence for the overthinking artist.
Are there things you intentionally leave unexplained in your work, even if clarifying them might make it more accessible?
Yes. I often write about pretty dark things that happened with specific people, and I find it important to edit out details that could shed too much light on who I’m speaking about.
I chose to be an artist, and it’s important to me to protect the privacy of people who didn’t choose that, whether I like them or not. It’s a tough line to walk in the pursuit of honesty, but there are things in life way more important than music, and people are one of them.

When someone hears your music for the first time, what do you want them to feel — not understand, but physically or emotionally experience?
Permission. Permission to feel angry, sad, a little twisted, vengeful, slutty — whatever they need to feel. I gave myself permission to feel what I needed to in writing this project, and I want that for other people when they listen to it.
Future of Music is about artists shaping what comes next. Do you think the future of music lies more in sound, visuals, or how the two collide?
I think the future of music is about to split into hyper-polished AI-driven music and the antithesis of it: less autotune, more raw and real instrumentation, more imperfections.
I’ll be on the latter side personally. I have no desire to use AI in my music. My problem with it isn’t that complex — I just find it very unromantic, and it doesn’t appeal to me.
Sound and visuals will always walk hand in hand. I think we’ll see more beautiful visuals around music, but in the music space, music will continue to drive it.
What role does mystery play in your work, in a moment where everything is expected to be documented and explained?
Unfortunately for me, mystery comes quite naturally because I’m incredibly shy. I’m at odds with social media right now. I love using it to connect with fans, but I personally don’t have this natural drive to post on the internet.
I personally adore a little mystery. It’s fun. I wonder sometimes, with the internet being so saturated, what would happen if an artist just didn’t have social media and managed to break through slowly through pure music discovery on YouTube, Apple Music, Spotify, and so on. I can hear marketing teams everywhere screaming, but I do think if you commit to the bit, it could work.
What are your thoughts on the future of music in Canada?Canada is so rich with talent and authentic new ideas. We’re lucky to live in a place that cultivates an environment of unique collaborations. I think we’ll see more Canadian artists breaking through globally and taking each other up along the way.







Holzman and Hughes at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.Courtesy of Ekko Astral
Holzman and Hughes in Brooklyn, May 2026.Griffin Lotz for Rolling Stone



There’s no immediate resolution in any of this. There’s no surrender either — and a lot of great escape. White’s slide guitar in “Dollar Bill” sounds like a National Steel on steroids until the solo, when it turns into what seems like a theremin gone postal. “I Can’t Believe What I’m Hearing” has a great pop-wise chorus closer to the Pretty Things than Son House. And don’t miss White’s wry aside to the White Stripes’ old creation myth in the second verse of “G.O.D.,” on the way to the real business at hand. “Well, it’s the beginning of the world now,” he declares at the song’s end. “Let’s do it all over again.”

Jay-Z has turned the 30th anniversary of his classic debut album into a major marketing event
Jay-Z Knows the Past Still Pays
There’s a pleasant absurdity to the advertisements for JAŸ-Z30 that are currently found across New York’s subway tunnels. Their dramatic imagery — a stark black backdrop pierced through the center with a pair of hands, presumably Jay’s, fixed into the famous Roc diamond — invites a kind of religious authority that feels a touch ironic for anyone who’s old enough to remember all types of handwringing over those very hand symbols only a few years ago. And maybe that’s the point. By now, nostalgia’s grip extends layers deep. So much so that you could find yourself waiting for the train, reminiscing on the days when people still made jokes about the so-called Illuminati.
Jay-Z’s months-long campaign commemorating the 30th anniversary of Reasonable Doubt and the 25th anniversary of The Blueprint has indeed resurfaced the rapper-turned-mogul’s success story. Reasonable Doubt, released in 1996, positioned Jay as not only a resonant voice in hip-hop but also in the increasingly lucrative business around it. After major labels passed, the album was released independently through Roc-A-Fella Records and Priority Records, setting the tone for Jay’s career as a business…man.
And in the full-court press campaign around this summer’s anniversaries, culminating in this weekend’s trio of performances at Yankee Stadium, Jay’s business acumen is again at center focus. You’d be forgiven for throwing around buzzwords like “multichannel” or “cross-platform” to describe the slate of festivities. There was a Spotify-backed takeover of the J and Z trains; custom JAŸ-Z30 subway maps and a Google Maps guide; commemorative Brooklyn Public Library cards; and most recently Bowery Station and DUMBO pop-ups with archival footage and merch. (That these Yankee Stadium shows come on the heels of Taylor Swift’s wedding at MSG suggests some sort of mega-rich takeover of cultural institutions, but let’s leave that one for another day.)
The moves come as nostalgia continues to drive a considerable chunk of the music industry’s profits. In an era when old songs can circulate infinitely on streaming platforms, gaining new life in the form of everything from samples to memes, and when superfans are willing to spend on physical goods, limited merch, and live experiences, album anniversaries have become their own product launches. Jay-Z’s Reasonable Doubt campaign is only the splashiest recent example.
No wonder, then, that Beyoncé already appears to be setting the stage for her own run of commemorations for the upcoming 20th anniversary of her album B’Day in September. Over the weekend, she released her first new song in two years, titled “Morning Dew (Donk),” to tease the upcoming reissue. According to Luminate, older music still dominates attention, with only 43 percent of U.S. on-demand audio streams in 2025 coming from tracks released in the previous five years. This is also one reason why vinyl and physical formats have seen renewed value in recent years, with the RIAA reporting that vinyl sold 46.8 million units in the U.S. in 2025, compared with 29.5 million CDs. Luminate says superfans are 20 percent of U.S. music listeners and spend heavily on live events and physical merchandise; 73 percent of these fans purchase physical merch, versus 26 percent of general music listeners.
In today’s industry, having a major anniversary is like having a new product to promote, a way to participate in an already thriving marketplace for nostalgia. The demand is visible well beyond official artist stores: Vintage concert tees now trade as collectibles, with one 1967 Grateful Dead shirt selling at Sotheby’s for $19,300 and rare rap tees treated as wearable archives of hip-hop history. Anniversary campaigns give artists and labels a way to reclaim that energy, turning the secondary market’s appetite for old symbols into new, officially sanctioned products.
Jay-Z’s official anniversary store turns that logic into a menu of objects: a $1,500 collector’s crate, a $300 cassette box, $400 Yankees jerseys, and four-figure varsity jackets. Of course, Jay is far from alone when it comes to legacy acts cashing in on nostalgia. He’s more like one salient example of a much larger wave of artists and promoters marketing anniversary products that includes the Smashing Pumpkins’ Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness 30th anniversary super-deluxe edition, My Chemical Romance’s Black Parade stadium tour, and the returned Warped Tour, among many others.
Five years before Reasonable Doubt became the occasion for library cards, pop-ups, collector crates, and stadium spectacle, its 25th anniversary was marked by an NFT. In 2021, Sotheby’s and Roc Nation auctioned a one-of-one Derrick Adams artwork tied to the album, billed as the only official Jay-Z-authorized commemoration of the anniversary. Around the same time, Roc-A-Fella was in court over co-founder Damon Dash’s attempted sale of a Reasonable Doubt-related NFT, a dispute that ended with a judgment making clear that no shareholder could sell or dispose of an interest in the album — including through an NFT — without the company’s authorization.
That ownership question is becoming harder to avoid as music enters the AI era, where the archive is not only something to reissue, exhibit, or sell, but something that can be scraped, modeled, and trained on. Last week, SZA took to Twitter to express frustration with AI music company Suno, notably calling out Diplo by name as one of the company’s investors. “DO NOT GIVE AWAY YOUR VIBRANIUM !!! DO NOT TRAIN AI WITH YOUR GENIUS,” she wrote on Twitter. Her complaint was joined by Kenneth Blume, who said Suno’s workers were “stealing from countless struggling musicians.”
For an artist with a legacy as impactful as Jay-Z’s, the current anniversary boom feel like the latest phase of a longer project of deciding who gets to turn hip-hop history into intellectual property. Jay-Z’s legacy deserves preservation; few catalogs have made a stronger case for it. But the more that preservation arrives through limited-edition objects, auction platforms, luxury merch, and authorized experiences, the more it has to answer a harder question: When does protecting the archive become another way of extracting value from it?