Skip to content
Search

Trump, Musk, Lutnick Show Up in Latest Epstein Files Release

The files were made public a month after a deadline imposed by Congress through a transparency law

Trump, Musk, Lutnick Show Up in Latest Epstein Files Release

On Friday, the Justice Department finally unveiled some 3 million documents from the criminal investigations of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, in accordance with a law that established a deadline of Dec. 19, 2025, for making the material public. The DOJ’s statement on the release, which includes more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, noted that this brings their total disclosures about the notorious and well-connected sex trafficker to about 3.5 million pages.

According to the DOJ, the documents came from a variety of law enforcement proceedings related to Epstein’s activities and eventual death by suicide in a jail cell in 2019 while he was awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. “These files were collected from five primary sources including the Florida and New York cases against Epstein, the New York case against Maxwell, the New York cases investigating Epstein’s death, the Florida case investigating a former butler of Epstein, multiple FBI investigations, and the Office of Inspector General investigation into Epstein’s death,” the department explained.


For the past year, Donald Trump — a close friend of Epstein’s for more than a decade before a falling out in the mid-2000s — has faced hard questions about why his administration was not publishing the so-called “Epstein files” as he had promised to during his 2024 presidential campaign. In the first year of his second term, he tried to dismiss the sordid Epstein saga (and his heavily documented relationship with the financier) as “bullshit” and a “hoax,” to no avail. His MAGA base was further incensed when the DOJ announced in July 2025 that it had found no evidence that Epstein kept a “client list” of people he trafficked girls to or that he was murdered in a scheme protect his associates from prosecution. (His accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted of sex trafficking and conspiracy charges in 2021 and is serving a 20-year prison sentence.)

In November, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed by Trump, which required the U.S. Attorney General to make the content of the multiple Epstein investigations “publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format.”

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a press briefing on Friday that the DOJ has 6 million documents in total but would not unseal all of them in order to protect victims and avoid disseminating the child sexual abuse material included. He also declared that the department had not sought to shield Trump in any way when preparing the latest batch of files to drop. “We comply with the act, and there is no ‘protect President Trump.’ We didn’t protect or not protect anybody,” Blanche said. “I mean, I think that there’s a hunger or a thirst for information that I do not think will be satisfied by the review of these documents. And there’s nothing I can do about that.”

A group representing Epstein’s survivors, which has roundly criticized the Trump administration’s handling of files on him, blasted Friday’s disclosures as incomplete and damaging to those abused. “This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files is being sold as transparency, but what it actually does is expose survivors,” the group said in a statement shared with Rolling Stone. “Once again, survivors are having their names and identifying information exposed, while the men who abused us remain hidden and protected. That is outrageous. As survivors, we should never be the ones named, scrutinized, and retraumatized while Epstein’s enablers continue to benefit from secrecy. This is a betrayal of the very people this process is supposed to serve.”

“The Justice Department cannot claim it is finished releasing files until every legally required document is released and every abuser and enabler is fully exposed,” the survivor group’s statement continued. “We need to hear directly from Attorney General Pam Bondi when she appears before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11.” Last February, Bondi weathered significant backlash for a much-hyped stunt in which she distributed binders of Epstein documents to MAGA influencers only for it to quickly emerge that these documents were already publicly available. She is expected to be grilled on the Epstein case as well as Trump’s weaponization of the Justice Department to seek retribution against political enemies.

Included in Friday’s dump are documents from the FBI, which include allegations that individuals made to the agency about Trump while he was running for president. The Justice Department insisted that these allegations are baseless. “This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the Act,” the DOJ said. “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”

Among these uncorroborated complaints that mention Trump are graphic accounts of sexual abuse that name other powerful men who knew Epstein, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, who for years represented him as an attorney. Multiple tips led to follow-up contact from the FBI, according to the documents, though it’s not clear if any resulted in an official and extensive investigation. A number of the accounts temporarily vanished from the DOJ website on Friday, then reappeared, prompting some on social media to speculate that the White House may have sought to cover them up, though there is no evidence that it did so.

Another person to come up in the new tranche of documents was Elon Musk. Emails showed that Epstein and Musk corresponded in December 2013 — five years after Epstein was convicted of soliciting a minor for prostitution in Florida and required to register as a sex offender — about plans to meet on Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little Saint James, over the New Year holiday. “We will be in St. Bart’s,” Musk wrote at one point. “When should we head to your island on the 2nd?” It’s not clear whether the visit they discussed ever took place, although Epstein did offer to fly Musk in on a helicopter.

Amid a public feud last year following his exit from the government as the administrator of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, Musk accused Trump of withholding Epstein documents because he was named in them. “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,” he wrote in an X post in June. “That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” He later deleted his posts about Trump’s connections to Epstein.

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s commerce secretary, also planned a trip to Epstein’s private island, according to 2012 emails included in Friday’s document drop. In an interview last year, Lutnick claimed that he had cut off all contact with Epstein in 2005, but the exchange from seven years later, which had not previously been disclosed, shows that he inquired about bringing his wife and children to Little Saint James for a meal. A subsequent message from Epstein to Lutnick read “Nice seeing you,” suggesting that the visit did take place, but Lutnick claimed to The New York Times on Friday that he “spent zero time” with Epstein.

Blanche downplayed the possibility of exposing anyone else’s involvement in Epstein’s crimes. “I don’t think the public or you all are going to uncover men within the Epstein files who abused these women, unfortunately,” he told reporters, although he vowed to go after individuals if evidence agains them came to light. “I don’t know whether there are men out there that abused these women,” he said. “If we learn about information and evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will.”

More Stories

Oh, Just Trump Saying Republicans Should ‘Nationalize’ and ‘Take Over’ Elections

Oh, Just Trump Saying Republicans Should ‘Nationalize’ and ‘Take Over’ Elections

Donald Trump’s approval numbers are in the tank, which may or may not have something to do with the fact that on multiple occasions in recent weeks he has teased the idea of somehow canceling the midterm elections. The White House has insisted Trump was “joking,” but it certainly didn’t seem like he was playing around when he proposed another wild idea to Dan Bongino: that Republicans should “take over” and “nationalize” the nation’s voting systems.

“The Republicans should say, we want to take over, we should take over the voting, the voting in at least many — 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting,” the president told the podcaster-turned-top FBI official-turned-podcaster in an interview that aired Monday, after pushing the false idea that Democrats bring non-citizens into the United States specifically so they will vote for them.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Out at the Grammys: Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, SZA, Olivia Dean Speak Out
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Stewart Cook/CBS/Getty Images; VALERIE MACON/AFP/Getty Images

ICE Out at the Grammys: Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, SZA, Olivia Dean Speak Out

Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, Shaboozey, and Olivia Dean all took home Grammys Sunday night, and all took a moment during their speeches to speak out on behalf of immigrants or call out ICE as the Trump admin’s brutal and deadly immigration crackdown continues.

Bad Bunny shared arguably the most pointed and poignant words while accepting the Grammy for Best Música Urbana Album, which began: “Before I say, ‘Thank God,’ I’m going to say, ‘ICE out.’”

Keep ReadingShow less
‘ICE Out’: Protest Songs From Bruce Springsteen, My Morning Jacket, NOFX, and Others

Bruce Springsteen and My Morning Jacket's Jim James.

Sergione Infuso/Corbis/Getty Images; Astrida Valigorsky/Getty Images

‘ICE Out’: Protest Songs From Bruce Springsteen, My Morning Jacket, NOFX, and Others

In January, ICE agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, while attempting to arrest and deport undocumented men, women, and children on President Donald Trump’s orders. Those deaths and the violent manner in which ICE operates have sparked protests in Minnesota and around the world. They’ve also caught the attention of activist-minded musicians, including Bruce Springsteen, NOFX, and My Morning Jacket, who have released songs and albums condemning the government agency. Here is a list of the most damning ICE protest songs.

Bruce Springsteen, “Streets of Minneapolis”

With a title that recalls another protest song Springsteen wrote, “Streets of Philadelphia,” which addressed the AIDS crisis, “Streets of Minneapolis” narrates the arrival of “Trump’s thugs” in the city and how their actions led to “two dead, left to die on snow-filled streets,” naming Good and Pretti. “We’ll remember the names of those who died on the streets of Minneapolis,” he sings in the chorus. The song ends with protesters chanting, “ICE out, ICE out.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Nicki Minaj Bravely Vows to Protect World’s Biggest Bully
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Nicki Minaj Bravely Vows to Protect World’s Biggest Bully

Two of the world’s most infamous bullies — one a U.S. president bitten with the imperialist bug and another a rap icon known for attacking other celebrities online in her orbit — joined forces in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday in a public show of support.

During a U.S. Treasury event, Nicki Minaj stood next to Donald Trump and from behind a podium, declared: “I am probably the president’s Number One fan.” Following her words of devotion, Minaj took to social media later that evening and posted a photo of a “Trump Gold Card” alongside the caption “Welp.” According to the official website, the card requires a $1,000,000 contribution plus a $15,000 processing fee, and in return, offers “U.S. residency in record time.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump Won’t Attend Super Bowl, Slams Bad Bunny and Green Day: ‘I’m Anti-Them’
Bob Kupbens/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Donald Trump Won’t Attend Super Bowl, Slams Bad Bunny and Green Day: ‘I’m Anti-Them’

Donald Trump revealed in an interview Saturday that he won’t be attending the Super Bowl, and slammed a pair of musical acts set to perform on February 8 in Santa Clara, California.

Speaking to the New York Post, the president, who attended the 2025 Super Bowl, said he wouldn’t be at Levi’s Stadium for the big game because “it’s just too far away.” “I’ve [gotten] great hands [at] the Super Bowl. They like me,” Trump said. “I would go if, you know, it was a little bit shorter.”

Keep ReadingShow less