At first glance, Fat Mike’s version of retirement feels like a punchline. When we speak, the former NOFX frontman is in Sacramento, in the middle of a World Poker Tour stop, coming off a final table appearance. He talks casually about home games with professionals in Las Vegas, about occasionally crossing paths with celebrity players, about the strange intimacy of a scene that, like punk before it, operates as a tight-knit subculture. Then there’s golf, another unexpected hobby, which he’s been playing for years. None of it resembles slowing down.
If anything, stepping away from NOFX has only multiplied his output. Film festivals, music production, business ventures, a stage musical in development. The idea of retirement, as he frames it, was never about stopping, but about shifting mediums. At the center of that transition is 40 Years of Fuckin' Up, a new documentary that he positions as the definitive closing statement on NOFX.
40 Years of Fuckin Up: the trailer youtu.be
The project, led by Canadian director James Buddy Day, initially took a direction that didn’t sit right with him. “The first cut was really dramatic,” he explains. “Not funny at all.” Coming from a filmmaker known for true crime, the tone skewed dark, focusing heavily on recent tensions within the band. “He really concentrated on the drama between the band from our last tour, because that’s all the footage he had.”
What followed was months of reconstruction. Mike took a flight to Calgary and began rebuilding the film from the ground up, combing through decades of archival material: old tapes, interviews, fragments scattered across the internet. The goal wasn’t just to correct the tone, but to reshape the narrative entirely. Where a conventional music documentary might center on craft, influence, or legacy, this one deliberately avoids those paths.
In typical NOFX fashion, it leans into dysfunction.
“There’s not a lot of music in it,” he explains. “Because that’s not what it’s about.” Live footage appears, but rarely in its expected form. Songs collapse mid-performance and band members argue onstage. At one point, the group botches the opening track of a show and has to restart. These are not outtakes. They are the story.
The decision crystallized after an unlikely test screening at a fetish event in the Caribbean, where the audience had no prior connection to NOFX. “The first timeI showed it in front of people was at a fetish event in the caribbean. So it's all rubberists; no one knows who my band is. They didn't know who I was, they just knew me as, like, a rubber slut. So I showed it for them and they laughed and cried. But they got bored at the very end when we're just playing music.”
That response forced a rethink. The music was cut back, but the mess was left in.
The film’s central tension, however, extends beyond stage antics. It documents, in real time, the fracture of a decades-long relationship between Mike and guitarist Eric Melvin. What begins as distance escalates into legal conflict, culminating in formal accusations over financial misconduct. The timing is as stark as it gets: legal papers arrive the day after NOFX’s final show.
For Mike, the emotional turning point predates that moment. It comes with the publication of a feature in Spin Magazine, built around interviews conducted with the band during their final run. Expecting a retrospective on recording their catalog, he instead finds a piece centered almost entirely on him, constructed through critical, often harsh commentary from his bandmates.
“It was one of the worst days of my life,” he says.
The sense of betrayal is amplified by the fact that these grievances had rarely been expressed directly. In the documentary, those same tensions resurface through interview footage. The difference is that this time, Mike chooses not to respond. No rebuttals, no corrections, no attempt to reshape perception.
That restraint is intentional. Initially, he considered cutting sections or inserting counterpoints. It was his wife who pushed him in another direction: leave everything in, and say nothing.

The result is one of the film’s more unsettling dynamics. Band members speak candidly, sometimes harshly, about him. He remains largely silent, present but not defensive. It creates ambiguity around blame, forcing viewers to sit with conflicting perspectives rather than guiding them toward a resolution.
“I didn’t want to judge anyone,” he says. “That’s what I’ve always done in my songs.”
If the film dismantles the mythology of NOFX as a band, it also complicates the persona of Fat Mike as a performer. One of its more revealing threads centers on his relationship to the stage itself. For years, substance use functioned less as indulgence than as a coping mechanism, a way to maintain a version of himself he no longer fully inhabited.
“I couldn’t fake it,” he explains. “So I had to find a way to get up there.”
That realization reframes much of the band’s final years. What appeared externally as chaos or excess becomes, in retrospect, a form of adaptation. The decision to end NOFX, then, wasn’t solely about interpersonal conflict, even if that accelerated the timeline. It was also about a growing disconnect between identity and performance.
The film extends that introspection into more personal territory, particularly around gender expression. Mike has long been open about his affinity for fetishism, but the documentary presents it in a more vulnerable, less performative context. One scene, in particular, resonated with his daughter in a way he hadn’t anticipated.
“She came to the premiere with a few of her friends. After, she came up and she said, ‘I knew you wore dresses… but I never saw you get feminine,’” he recalls. “And when she saw that, she was like, ‘Oh, that’s my dad.’” The moment hit him unexpectedly. “I just started crying. I didn’t expect that.”
The effect was the opposite of what he feared. “I thought it might estrange us,” he says. “But it brought us closer.”
It’s one of several moments that inform his broader goal for the film. Beyond documenting a band’s dissolution, he wants it to function as something more universal. “I want people to laugh and cry,” he says. “But also to feel like things aren’t impossible.”
In keeping with NOFX’s long-standing DIY ethos, traditional distribution channels are off the table. “We’re not selling it to a streaming site. We’re not selling DVDs,” he says. Instead, screenings will happen monthly, in independent theaters, ideally with bars. “I want our fans to have a place to go where they can watch the movie together and fucking party.”
The model is intentional. “You can watch NOFX on YouTube on your couch, or you can go see a concert,” he says. “You’re supposed to watch a movie around other people. So you get the laughs, you cry at the same time.”
Outside the film, he’s anything but idle. A new Codefendants record is imminent. “That’s the best record I’ve ever produced,” he says without hesitation. A vodka brand, Fatty’s Bottom Shelf Vodka, launches shortly after. “It tastes expensive,” he jokes, “but calling it bottom shelf is fucking funny.” A stage musical is set to open in Las Vegas.
A relationship-focused website, years in development, is finally live.
“I can’t stop,” he says simply. The documentary may function as a final chapter, but it’s one that refuses to tidy things up. “It could have been ended on a higher note, if there wasn’t that drama,” he admits. “But it’s honest.”
For Fat Mike, that’s the only thing that matters.














Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny in a split image
Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny Dealt With Trump Quietly. It’s a Smart Move
Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny are both major superstars — and they’ve shared some parallels in their careers and discographies for several years. Now, they’re even using the same playbook to deal with taunts and baiting from Donald Trump and the White House’s social media teams.
Since Trump took office during his second term, he and his administration have been using social media as part of their communication strategy. The propaganda-like, rage-bait-style clips often lean into internet culture and use popular music to make light of Trump’s most egregious actions, like his immigration policy and war-hungry foreign policy.
Olivia Rodrigo, Katy Perry, Ariana Grande, and Noah Kahan are just some of the artists who have had their music used in these videos without their permission — and vehemently spoken out against these actions and against the president. In the past couple of weeks, the Trump administration seems to have wanted to provoke a response from two of the world’s biggest superstars: Bad Bunny and Swift.
On July 30, the official White House TikTok used “La Mudanza” for a particularly tone-deaf video about immigration that celebrated the number of deportations under Trump. A week later, a video with text that said, “mood because it’s August and Donald Trump is your president” set to Swift’s “August” was uploaded by Team Trump, the president’s official campaign account. The caption was an overt provocation: “I’m sure Taylor Swift is going to be super excited we used her song,” it read. Days later, another clip from the same account featured an edited version of Swift’s Red album cover with text that said, “Did you know that Taylor Swift wrote a whole album about the color of the Republican Party?”
Neither musician has released a public statement denouncing the use of their music in Trump’s videos. Instead, two of the world’s biggest superstars quietly removed their songs from videos posted by official accounts linked to the Trump administration. (It’s unclear if there is a TikTok feature that allows selective sound muting on videos or if the respective teams reached out to the social media accounts directly.) The tracks are still available for other TikTok accounts to use in their videos, making their silence a pointed — and smart — approach. Both Bad Bunny and Swift seem to recognize the president and his administration’s tactics for what they are: antagonizing moves that keep the Trump conversation centered on his social media presence, rather than his actual policies and the harm they commit. Why would they add their star power to the conversation and stoke the flames when that’s exactly what the White House appears to want?
Some people argue that celebrities should wield their platform to denounce Trump at any chance if they are truly not politically aligned with his MAGA politics. But because they hold so much influence, these superstars need to be strategic about how they use it.
Benito, in particular, has been incredibly outspoken about his politics. He stood on two of the world’s biggest stages and used them to voice pro-immigration messages, denounce Trump’s policies, and highlight Puerto Rico as it struggles with the effects of U.S. imperialism. “Before I say, ‘Thank God,’ I’m going to say, ‘ICE out,’” the Puerto Rican superstar said at the 2026 Grammys. “We’re not savage. We’re not animals. We’re not aliens. We are humans and we are Americans.” Last summer, Bad Bunny’s music video for “Nuevayol” used a voice that sounds a lot like the president’s to deliver a pro-immigrant message. “I made a mistake. I want to apologize to the immigrants in America. I mean the United States. I know America is the whole continent,” the voice bellows out of a Seventies radio toward the end of the video. “I want to say that this country is nothing without the immigrants.”
Fans were convinced that Benito would speak out against the official White House TikTok account when it used one of his most political songs. But commenting on the video would only blow up the discussion for a wider audience. When Rodrigo, Perry, Grande, and Kahan made public comments, spokespeople for the White House used the opportunity to spread hateful rhetoric. “We’ll say this one last time: what’s actually barbaric, inhumane, and heinous are the criminal illegal aliens who have injured and murdered innocent American citizens,” Abigail Jackson said in a statement to Rolling Stone after Grande spoke out. It’s the antithesis of what Benito said during his Grammys speech this year: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love.”
Swift, on the other hand, has dealt with Trump and the right-wing’s instigations for years, each one crazier than the last. The TikTok videos from the last week aren’t even the first time that the administration has used the singer’s music for social media videos. Last fall, both the official White House TikTok account and Team Trump used songs from Swift’s then-newly released The Life of a Showgirl in separate videos. One plucked the lyrics “pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes” from “The Fate of Ophelia” to celebrate Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and the first and second ladies. The others boasted about Trump by using “Father Figure” and honored Melania Trump’s Patriot of the Year award with “Opalite.” As of Aug. 10, the audio is not available under all of these specific videos.
The pop superstar has not spoken publicly about these instances. But she has made her disdain for Trump clear. Over the years, Swift has criticized Trump’s autocratic leadership. On X, she wrote “we will vote you out” and endorsed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the 2020 and 2024 elections, respectively. In 2019, Swift told Rolling Stone, “There’s literally nothing worse than white supremacy. It’s repulsive. There should be no place for it.”
Even though she’s shared her liberal viewpoints on issues like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and racial inequality, Swift has still faced ridiculous claims of being MAGA-aligned and folding in right-wing dog whistles to her music — and that’s without ever naming Trump. If Swift were to make a statement about her music being used by the Trump administration, the attention-seeking president would absolutely revel in it. Getting Swift and Bad Bunny to weigh in is exactly the type of headline grabber he would love to draw attention from his remarkably unpopular presidency.