Dry Cleaning had big plans for January 2026. The English band spent much of the past two years making their third and best album, Secret Love, which brings their uniquely beguiling mix of post-punk and art-rock styles to a new creative peak. Now, with the album’s release set for early this month on 4AD, they were preparing to launch a 21-date tour of North America, historically a strong market for the band, with a Jan. 23 show in Chicago.
Ticket sales were looking good, and the band was feeling excited. But their U.S. visas hadn’t come through yet, months after they got their applications in. Soon they were facing thousands of dollars in expediting fees, on top of the already high costs of mounting a tour of that size. “I started to look at it and I was like, ‘I’m a little bit worried about cash flow,’” says their manager, Tim Hampson. “There were just too many variables starting to stack in a way that made me feel extremely uncomfortable.”
And so, around the middle of November 2025, Dry Cleaning made the agonizing decision to scratch the tour they’d announced just a month earlier and postpone most of its dates to later in 2026. In the statement they released in early December, they cited “the increasingly hostile economic forces that govern touring in the present day.” It was a remarkably upfront acknowledgment of a growing concern in the music business: According to many, it’s harder than ever for bands to make ends meet by playing live music.
“It’s a very brutal situation,” says Dry Cleaning’s lead vocalist, Florence Shaw. “It was definitely much, much, much more doable just a few years ago. Things have got nasty. It’s not even about making a profit. It’s about actually being able to do it at all.”
“It’s becoming more and more common,” adds their bass player, Lewis Maynard. “You see lots of bands just canceling tours left, right, and center. And tours that are selling well, which is crazy!”
That last point is particularly rankling for bands like Dry Cleaning, who have spent years working hard to develop their sound and build an audience for their unforgettable live shows. “It’s not like there’s no supply and demand,” says their drummer, Nick Buxton. “There is demand and there is supply, and the revenue from doing a big tour is significant. It’s a lot of money. It’s just the flights, the tour buses, the hotels, even the food, are just exploding at the moment and making it unrealistic.”
“Something’s going to change, I hope soon,” Maynard says. “Otherwise a whole huge section of gigging is going to disappear. It’s scary.”
Dry Cleaning had to rethink their plans for touring the U.S. this yearAmy E. Price/Getty ImagesIT’S NEVER BEEN EASY to earn a living playing shows, as anyone who’s spent more than a couple weeks in the music business will tell you. “To make it as an artist out there on the road takes a lot of timing, talent, luck — all those things,” says Karl Morse, a partner agent at ROAM who books tours for popular acts including Goose, Khruangbin, and the Lumineers. But there’s a widespread consensus that it’s gotten much more difficult in recent years, especially for developing and mid-size touring acts.
Even some well-established bands are giving up on touring in the U.S., like Garbage, who blamed “the economics of the music industry” when they billed their most recent headlining tour as their last ever. “We’re not complaining, we’ve had a fucking great run,” singer Shirley Manson told fans at a Sept. 17 stop in Washington, D.C. “My concern is for young musicians who go out there and tour — they’re holding down jobs, they take two weeks off their work and they go around the country. Sometimes they’re sleeping in their van, sometimes they’re staying in really, really dodgy so-called motels, and it’s dangerous and it’s really unacceptable and it really has to stop.”
Many of the industry veterans who spoke for this story trace today’s problems back to the existential challenge of 2020, when Covid shut down live music for months, putting countless crew members out of work and closing numerous venues for good. When mRNA vaccines rolled out and concerts resumed the following year, there was a huge surge in demand at all levels of the market, but it didn’t last. “Everyone was ready to come back out, and when it was safe, we saw a really strong, let’s call it six to 12 months there,” Morse says. “Everything was selling well at a premium. But then afterwards, it kind of leveled out. And it’s gotten tougher.”
The live music business is still dealing with the personnel shortage that resulted from that tumultuous period, which ultimately left fewer experienced crew members, promoters, and agents on hand as many transitioned to other careers. The bigger challenge, though, is rooted in the rapidly escalating affordability crisis that defines so much of life in this country.
“First and foremost, we’ve been dealt a tough hand with inflation and wage stagnation,” Morse says. “The availability of inventory for tour buses, the cost of those tour buses, the fuel for those tour buses, accommodation, taxes, general production expenses — all of that has slimmed the margin. The bottom line is, it’s more expensive to tour.”
“The cost of gas is crazy,” adds Andrew Morgan, an agent at Wasserman who works with MJ Lenderman, Wednesday, and Angel Olsen. “It’s gone down a little bit, but it’s still really high. Inflation is making groceries more expensive, so trying to eat reasonably on the road and not always eat fast food is tough. The cost of everything is going up.”
Shirley Manson of Garbage has spoken out about the economic challenges facing touring actsNaomi Rahim/Getty ImagesThose same economic pressures lead to tough choices for fans who have less cash to spread around on the shows they want to see. “If you’re Taylor Swift, if you’re Beyoncé, your profit margins are going to be all right,” Morse says. “But from a fan perspective, if you’re a family of four going to one of those shows, that’s a massive expenditure that might replace 10 concerts at the theater level throughout the year…. How do you incentivize people to go when their bank account might be struggling right now?”
Morgan makes a similar point about another of last year’s biggest success stories: “The amount of money that it costs to go see Oasis just sucks all this money out of the general showgoing public of any city that that tour hit,” he says, admitting that he himself saw the Gallagher brothers’ enormously lucrative reunion tour twice. “How many shows at a smaller club are they going to have to not go to because they spent that money on Oasis?”
As those examples illustrate, the reality of touring in 2026 includes a stark class divide between the A-list acts playing stadiums and everyone else. “The disparity between artists that do well and artists that do less well is broadening,” Morgan says. “It’s getting bigger.”
Even artists who succeed at climbing the traditional ladder of live music — tiny unofficial venues to small clubs to bigger clubs to theaters and onward — often find they have to navigate new obstacles as their careers grow. In Dry Cleaning’s case, the postponed tour will take them to some of the largest venues they’ve ever headlined, including places that can accommodate more than 1,500 fans in cities like New York; that means higher crew costs for things like stage lighting. “They’re on that cusp of being at the lower end of a bigger room. So the crew we need…. We can’t turn up at Brooklyn Steel without lights,” explains Hampson, their manager.
“There’s this catch-22 where as you start to build momentum, the expectations rise,” says Nik Soelter, who manages the buzzy New York acts Water From Your Eyes and This Is Lorelei. “The cost of the crew goes up so much, and the margins start to get even tighter. Maybe when you were at the DIY level and doing 200-cap rooms, things started to feel pretty good. All of a sudden you’re in 500-cap rooms and you’re like, ‘Oh, my God, we’re making even less money than before.’”
And since very few acts in any genre can count on significant income from streaming, finding a way to turn a profit or at least break even on the road is even more crucial. “It’s one of the last areas we could be potentially making money,” Maynard, Dry Cleaning’s bassist, adds. “So then if you’re losing money all across the board, you’re kind of fucked.”
DRY CLEANING ENDED UP salvaging their 2026 U.S. tour by pushing most of the dates to this spring, cobbling together some new shows to replace the handful they had to cancel, and rerouting their travel around a festival booking at Kilby Block Party in Salt Lake City. As the year began, Hampson was still working on securing a grant in the U.K. to help make up any shortfall in funds.
“If we get that, happy days,” he says. “But it is quite a crazy scenario where you’re relying on funding for a band that’s three critically acclaimed albums in, that have appeared on Jimmy Fallon a couple of times, going ‘How do we make this work?’ A mad place to be.”
Some artists from outside the U.S. have decided the costly, time-consuming visa application process is simply not worth it, and opted not to tour here at all. “I’ve got some international artists who say it’s too damn expensive to apply without knowing if it’s just going to get caught in limbo,” Morse says. “I personally book a lot of foreign artists who are taking a very cautious approach right now.”
Those that do tour here, wherever they’re from, know they can’t take fans for granted. “It’s a really hard ask to get somebody to not only spend money out of their pocket, but spend an evening of their life,” says Josh Stern, an agent at Ground Control Touring who works with acts including post-hardcore band Show Me the Body, independent Brooklyn rapper MIKE, and enigmatic British producer Vegyn. “You have to figure out how to make the shows unmissable.”
Some acts are trying to do that by putting together super-stacked bills combining multiple artists, or by scaling down to smaller rooms for a more intimate experience. Others talk about developing alternate revenue streams, like tour-exclusive merch — though the still-common practice of venues taking a cut of merch sales remains a source of consternation, especially since those same venues are reluctant to share their alcohol sales with the bands who get fans in the doors. “Everybody’s here to see this artist; they’re not here because you’re a bar, they’re here because you’re a venue,” Soelter says. “And I understand that running a venue is also a tight-margins game, and keeping the bar sales helps these venues stay afloat. But I think if you’re going to take a cut of merch sales, then you need to give a cut of bar sales.”
One artist looking for another way forward is Colleen Green. She broke through as an indie fave in the mid-2010s, performing sharp, catchy pop-punk songs backed only by her guitar and a drum machine at long-gone venues like Brooklyn’s Shea Stadium. Over the years, the tours got bigger, but not necessarily more profitable. “I did a Europe tour a couple years ago with a full band for the first time ever and ended up losing $5,000,” she says. (Sadly, that’s not an uncommon tale. “I think breaking even in Europe is the ultimate goal for everybody — just not being in the red on a European tour,” Soelter says.)
Colleen Green at a 2025 show with Rozwell KidGrant Kimura*Last year, Green toured North America with the band Rozwell Kid to mark the 10th anniversary of her cult-classic 2015 album I Want to Grow Up. It was fun to revisit the old songs, but also harder than she expected, as she added up the costs of travel, lodgings, and paying her backing band. “The most stressful part about it was, are we going to make any money?” she says. “And I hate that it comes down to that.”
So this winter, she’s trying something different: a fully DIY solo tour that she booked herself, just like the old days, playing record stores and pizza shops with her friend Cassie Ramone of Vivian Girls. When we spoke, shortly before the tour began on Jan. 20, Green was looking forward to workshopping some new songs in small venues like the ones she came up in.
“Man, maybe it won’t work,” she says. “But hopefully it does.”











Silent House
No Doubt’s Sphere residency is shaping up to be one of this year’s biggest live events.WireImage



Protesters gather at Harvey Weinstein's trial in 2020 in New York City.
The Music Industry’s Unfinished #MeToo Fight
April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month, and I’m writing this open letter not to call anyone out, but to invite you in.
The music industry has had several opportunities for a reckoning in recent years. But so far, it’s a reckoning the industry has managed to avoid. What we’ve seen instead are individual moments, isolated legal outcomes, and public spectacles that generate headlines but haven’t produced the systemic change this industry needs. The scrutiny that swept through Hollywood at the height of the #MeToo movement largely passed over the music industry. And while the last few years have heightened that scrutiny, the industry’s response has been mostly silence.
Historically, the legal window for survivors of sexual assault to seek justice was shockingly narrow. On the criminal side, prosecutors in New York had as few as five years to bring charges for most felony sexual assault cases. On the civil side, survivors had just three years to file a lawsuit. In California, the time limit to criminally prosecute cases of rape was within 10 years, and three years to pursue civil action.
For anyone who understands how trauma actually works, how long it can take a survivor to process what happened, to find the language for it, to feel safe enough to come forward, those timelines were never realistic. In 2019, New York extended the criminal statute of limitations to as long as 20 years for certain sex crimes and extended the civil window to 20 years as well. California removed the statute of limitations for prosecuting rape cases entirely in 2016, and gave sexual abuse survivors 10 years to pursue litigation civilly. But none of those changes were retroactive, meaning that anyone whose window had already closed was still locked out of the legal system.
In 2022, the Adult Survivors Act (ASA) in New York state was passed to address that gap. It opened a one-year lookback window, allowing survivors to file civil suits that the previous statute of limitations had barred, regardless of when the abuse occurred. New York City’s Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act provided an additional pathway for survivors to file claims. More than 3,500 complaints were filed before the ASA window closed in November 2023, and the music industry was at the center of some of the most high-profile cases. The lawsuits filed under these lookback windows didn’t just expose individual behavior. They exposed systems, institutional silence, and a culture that too often prioritized reputation and revenue over the safety of the people whose lives and labor make the industry thrive.
Editor’s picks
The 250 Greatest Albums of the 21st Century So Far
The 100 Best TV Episodes of All Time
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
100 Best Movies of the 21st Century
California followed with the Sexual Abuse and Cover-up Accountability Act, its own lookback window that revived civil claims for sexual assaults with some strings attached. A one-year window for claims prior to 2009 required evidence of an institutional cover-up. A related two-year window for incidents after Jan.1, 2009 was more expansive but was due to close at the end of this year. After the vague wording of the initial law caused mixed results in the courts, California legislators passed a second law, the Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act, which went into effect Jan. 1, 2026.
The new law opened an additional two-year filing window that is fully retroactive, expanding survivors’ ability to hold individual abusers accountable for sexual assault claims, no matter how old, without requiring them to also name a company or allege a cover-up. That window closes on Dec. 31, 2027. These laws aren’t just about courtrooms. They’re about culture. This wave of legislative shifts signals that the legal landscape is looking to provide more realistic pathways to keep up with society’s evolving understanding of the dynamics that enable sexual violence.
And yet, even with all of these new laws and legal claims, the industry has not had its reckoning. Fame, wealth, and power continue to distort and deny justice. What fandom and pop culture continue to prove is that if someone is talented enough, famous enough, and rich enough, there will always be people willing to ignore that person’s crimes, especially when those crimes are sexual in nature. Nostalgia and stardom have a way of putting people under a spell. I’ve seen it up close. Fame is a special kind of power that gets people to ignore things they would never tolerate from “normal people.” When the person accused is someone whose music is the soundtrack to their lives, the public reaction isn’t outrage. It’s a negotiation. It’s “But I love that song.” Celebrity turns the pursuit of justice into “content.” It turns survivors into characters in someone else’s story. And it gives the industry permission to do what it has always done: wait for the news cycle to pass and move on.
Related Content
What the Music Industry Can Learn from Sports About Fans
L.A. Reid Settles With Sexual Assault Accuser Ahead of Trial
L.A. Reid Sexual Assault Trial to Begin Next Week
Smokey Robinson Facing Two New Sexual Battery Accusers, Including a Man
That same power dynamic in the industry operates behind closed doors and away from cameras every day, making the most vulnerable susceptible to manipulation or worse. The gatekeepers who control whether your song gets picked, whether your deal gets signed, or whether you get invited back into potentially life-changing rooms hold a level of influence that extends well beyond the professional reach. And in an industry where so much happens informally — in studios late at night, at private events where the lines between business and social disappear — the opportunities for abuse of power are everywhere.
The music industry runs on collaboration. It runs on trust. A songwriter walks into a session with a producer they may have never met. An artist meets with an executive in a closed-door meeting to discuss a deal that could change their life. A young executive shows up on day one wanting nothing more than to prove they belong. Every one of these moments requires an environment where people feel safe enough to create, negotiate, learn, and say no without consequence. We all know that environment doesn’t always exist. And too many of us have looked the other way.
A 2024 global study by MIDiA Research, TuneCore, and Believe surveyed more than 4,100 music creators and professionals across 133 countries and found that three in five women in the music industry have experienced sexual harassment, and one in five have experienced sexual assault. More than 70 percent of those women did not report it, citing fear of retaliation and a belief that nothing would change. And for the women who did come forward, the outcomes weren’t much better. Fifty-six percent said their claims were ignored or dismissed, and nearly one-third were told to keep quiet.
So why hasn’t anything changed? Part of the answer is structural.
One of the biggest differences between the film industry and the music industry is organization. Hollywood has unions, guilds, and collective bodies that represent workers across the business. When the #MeToo movement began, those structures didn’t lead the charge, but they gave the movement somewhere to land and became vehicles for new codes of conduct, reporting systems, and protections. The music industry doesn’t have those same structures, but that doesn’t mean we’re powerless. It means we have to build differently. You don’t need a union to be unified. You don’t need to collectively bargain to have a collective consciousness. Keeping people safe in the rooms where music gets made is a human rights issue, and it should be something every company in this business can come to the table about.
The last few years have made this impossible to ignore. We have watched the federal prosecution and conviction of one of the most powerful figures in music history on charges tied to the exploitation of people inside his own organization. We have watched survivors come forward publicly, at tremendous personal cost, to tell stories that too many people in this business already knew.
And still, the question remains: what are the companies doing about it? Not the individuals. The companies. The record labels, music publishers, management firms, studios, and agencies. The institutions that fund the careers, expand the platforms, and decide what behavior gets addressed and what gets ignored.
As founder of The 100 Percenters, a nonprofit that aims to transform the standards of the music industry so that every working music creator can build a safe and sustainable career, I’ve watched this industry avoid its reckoning long enough. In response to that reality, The 100 Percenters created the Safe Music Business Pledge. A public commitment from companies across the music business to four straightforward principles: keep your people safe in the workplace and in studio sessions; report harassment and abuse when it happens and take action; refuse to tolerate inappropriate or abusive behavior; and create a safe space for those who don’t feel protected.
That’s it. Four commitments. None of them are controversial.
Organizations like the Recording Academy, BMI, SONA, LVRN, and others have already taken the pledge, and we welcome more support of this very important work. We are seeking record labels, publishers, and management firms with artists, songwriters, producers, and employees on their rosters. Companies that have the resources and the influence to set the standard for the entire industry.
Not having signed the pledge doesn’t mean a company is unsafe, and signing it doesn’t automatically make a company safe. But taking the pledge signals something that matters. It tells your artists, your songwriters, your producers, and your staff that you see the problem and you’re willing to do something about it.
The laws are evolving, the culture is shifting, survivors are speaking, and the public is watching. The reckoning this industry has managed to avoid is coming. The question is whether you will be on the right side of it.
If your company hasn’t taken the Safe Music Business Pledge, please visit the100percenters.com and sign it this month. If you’re an artist, songwriter, or producer reading this, I’m asking you to share the pledge with the companies you work with and tell them why it matters to you. We’ve even prepared an outreach template on our site to make that as easy as possible.
Trending Stories
Dave Mason, Traffic Co-Founder Who Penned ‘Feelin’ Alright?,’ Dead at 79
Tucker Carlson's Trump Apology Is Too Little, Too Late
Denise Richards Shares Emotional Tribute to Patrick Muldoon: 'We Thought We’d Live Forever'
We Were Never Going to Get a Real Michael Jackson Biopic
The Safe Music Business Pledge is a concrete step toward making sure the people who create the music that drives this entire ecosystem can do so without fear. The industry is built on songs. Let’s make sure the people who write, produce, and perform them can walk into every room knowing they’re protected.