Skip to content
Search

‘They’re Frightened of Diversity’: Rob Reiner on the Threat of Christian Nationalism

‘They’re Frightened of Diversity’: Rob Reiner on the Threat of Christian Nationalism

In a way, Rob Reiner has come full circle.

Decades ago, before The Princess Bride, before A Few Good Men, Reiner first made his mark as Michael “Meathead” Stivic, the liberal son-in-law to the racist, conservative Archie Bunker on one of the biggest TV shows of the 1970s, All in the Family. Week after week, Stivic stood up for liberal values in the face of Bunker’s jingoistic, racist nationalism. While conservatives loathed him, for progressives, he was one of the only voices of conscience on national television.


And now, half a century later, Reiner has co-produced the new documentary God and Country, which is like an extended argument with Archie’s descendants: the Christian nationalists who played a central role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, form the core of Donald Trump’s most committed base — and make Bunker’s racist patriotism seem almost quaint.

“Archie Bunker was a conservative and a patriot, but also a racist,” Reiner tells Rolling Stone. “And what we’re seeing now is the weaponization of that racism … These people [Christian nationalists] are fine with the idea that America should be a white, Christian nation. They’re frightened of what’s happening in this country with diversity. But we are a pluralistic society. E pluribus unum.”

According to God and Country, directed by Dan Partland and based on the book The Power Worshippers by Katherine Stewart, Christian nationalism has always been part of the American landscape, but took its current form in the 1950s, in the wake of Brown and the desegregation of public schools. It was then that right-wing, white Christians began realizing that their country was changing, and in response to Brown, they set up a network of so-called “segregation academies” — religious schools that, for a while at least, could still turn away nonwhite students.

But wait a minute – how is maintaining segregation a Christian issue? When did Jesus say that races should be kept separate?

As the numerous clergy and religious scholars in God and Country make clear, Christian nationalism is more of a political movement in religious garb than anything based in the Bible or Christian theology.

“Leaders of the movement often tell us this is about theology and religion,” Stewart said, “but this is not just about the culture wars or a dispute over theology. It’s a political war.”

As God and Country tells it, that war really got going in the 1970s, as “segregation academies” came under fire. Initially, movement leaders focused on an array of issues: fighting feminism, preserving “religious liberty” (i.e., the liberty to discriminate against Black people), and others. But one caught fire: abortion.

In many popular histories, the response to Roe v. Wade is what created the modern Christian right. But God and Country shows that, at first, Christian conservatives took little notice of it.

“The Christian nationalist movement started in the 1950s,” Reiner says. But by the 1970s, supporting segregation had become “an ugly, galvanizing issue. So they kind of dropped that and reenergized the movement with Roe v. Wade. But at the core of Christian nationalism is the white race.”

For nearly 40 years, the Christian nationalist movement won some battles, but kept losing the war. Yes, Ronald Reagan ushered in a new era of cultural conservatism. But Roe stayed on the books, America continued to grow more diverse, and with LGBTQ equality and same-sex marriage, it seemed to many Christian nationalists that the country was quite literally going to hell.

Enter Donald Trump.

On the surface, as Reiner explained, Trump would seem to be an unlikely hero to a conservative religious population: As one of the pastors interviewed in God and Country said, he was once held up as an embodiment of the seven deadly sins. “Seeing the rise of Trump,” says Reiner, “seeing the movement supporting this corrupt, failed pathological liar, I was very curious as to why this was happening. Why were they choosing this guy? In the past, evangelical Christians were big supporters of the Republican party — I understand that. But why support Donald Trump over Jeb Bush, who is an actual evangelical?”

The answer, says Reiner and several experts in the film, is power. Trump was seen — rightly, it turns out — as the “tough guy” who could deliver what “nice guys” could not. “This is the guy who’s gonna get it done,” one Christian-right leader said after meeting Trump in early 2016. 

For many of the religious leaders interviewed in the film, Christian nationalism’s embrace of Trump was proof that the movement was never really based in Christianity, but in a particular kind of nativist ethno-politics. But among the Christian nationalist faithful, Trump became God’s chosen one who would set America on the right path. Indeed, Trump’s many personal failings were seen as proof that this was God’s hand at work. And indeed, Trump did deliver: Roe overturned, conservative Christian judges throughout the federal bench (handpicked by one of their own), and a validation of the worldview that America had lost its past greatness, and must fight to get it back.

So it was theologically impossible for Trump to lose the 2020 election. In the eyes of Christian nationalists, “How could the election not be stolen?” asks Jonathan Seidel, a scholar of the movement, in the film. 

As a result, said Stewart, “Christian nationalism was an inescapable part of the attempted coup, and it remains a cornerstone of the MAGA movement and Trumpism.” Not everyone at the capitol on Jan. 6 was a Christian nationalist, but look at the videos and you’ll see a lot of Christian flags, Jesus 2020 signs, and religious imagery (crosses, shofars).

Perhaps the most disturbing part of God and Country is that things may well get worse, even if Joe Biden wins the next election. While Christian nationalists see America as a Christian nation and think a majority of Americans support them, this is far from the case. In fact, nearly two-thirds of Americans support the right to obtain an abortion, nearly three quarters support same-sex marriage. 

Moreover, Christian nationalism is white. According to exit polls, 80 percent of white evangelicals (who make up a quarter of the U.S. population) voted for Trump. Ninety percent of Black Christians voted for Biden. And the white Christian demographic, once dominant, is steadily declining — which is one reason many Christian nationalists have openly opposed democracy itself. Between America’s sacred, God-ordained mission and democracy, the choice for Christian nationalists is obvious.

These people are armed, they have their own media and cultural universes, they think that they’re fighting for the soul of America (as well as their own salvation), and they won’t simply go away if Biden wins in November. Even if they’re a minority, they’re an enraged, and heavily organized minority — and increasingly a threat to the American experiment.

“Can we preserve 249 years of self-rule created by the Founding Fathers, or will we slip into a theocratic autocracy?” asks Reiner. “We’re seeing the rise of autocracy and theocracy around the world — Donald Trump is the vessel for that to happen here in the United States. This is a movement that can potentially destroy everything that we’ve worked for.”

More Stories

Why Venezuela Could Be a Turning Point in Gen Z’s Support for Trump

President Donald Trump discussing Venezuela at a press conference at Mar-a-Lago.

Jim WATSON/AFP/Getty Images

Why Venezuela Could Be a Turning Point in Gen Z’s Support for Trump

When Donald Trump called himself “the peace president” during his 2024 campaign, it was not just a slogan that my fellow Gen Z men and I took seriously, but also a promise we took personally. For a generation raised in the shadow of endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it felt reassuring. It told us there was a new Republican Party that had learned from its failures and wouldn’t ask our generation to fight another war for regime change. That belief stood strong until the U.S. overthrew Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

Growing up in the long wake of the wars in Iraq in Afghanistan shaped how my generation learned to see Republicans. For us, “traditional” Republican foreign policy became synonymous with unnecessary conflicts that caused young people to bear the consequences. We heard how Iraq was sold to the public as a necessary war to destroy weapons of mass destruction, only to become a long conflict that defined the early adulthood of many millennials. Many of us grew up watching older siblings come home from deployments changed, and hearing teachers and coaches talk about friends who never fully came back. By the time we were old enough to pay attention, distrust of Bush-era Republicans wasn’t ideological, it was inherited from what we had heard.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Assault on the Environment Has Been Even Worse Than Experts Predicted
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Trump’s Assault on the Environment Has Been Even Worse Than Experts Predicted

Donald Trump has been on a vendetta against “windmills” — and, really, any form of clean energy — for many years. He has close ties to the fossil fuel industry, essentially telling them he’d do whatever they want if they gave his presidential campaign $1 billion. We knew Trump’s first year back in office would be a disaster for the climate — but experts say the scope of the damage has exceeded their worst fears.

Like the Los Angeles fires at the start of 2025, which were fueled by climate change, the damage that has been done has been overwhelming and brutal.

Keep ReadingShow less
Petitions to deport Nicki Minaj gain over 120,000 signatures and counting
CAYLO SEALS/GETTY IMAGES

Petitions to deport Nicki Minaj gain over 120,000 signatures and counting

Several Change.org petitions to deport Nicki Minaj to her native Trinidad and Tobago have amassed more than 120,000 signatures combined. The most popular petition — garnering over 83,000 signatures — started on July 9, 2025, and lists Minaj’s “harrass[ment]” of “the Carters” as one of the inciting issues (Minaj had been incessantly lambasting Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter on X at the time). There are also at least three other petitions created between Dec. 21 and 28, 2025, that coincide with Minaj’s controversial Dec. 21 appearance alongside conservative activist Erika Kirk at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest, where the rapper praised President Donald Trump’s administration.

One of the recent petitions began on Dec. 27 by a 16 year-old in Chicago named Tristan Hamilton, per the website, and has gained the most ground, with over 41,000 signatures at the time of writing. Using a photo of Minaj high-fiving Kirk as the petition’s lead image, Hamilton wrote that Minaj has left her LGBTQ fans “feeling deeply betrayed,” pointing to Minaj’s AmericaFest comments, “Boys, be boys…There’s nothing wrong with being a boy.” Some have seen Minaj’s appearance at the event as the rapper aligning with Turning Point’s historically anti-trans and queerphobic leadership. “Deporting Nicki Minaj back to Trinidad would serve as a reminder that public figures need to be accountable for their words and the broader impact they have on diverse communities,” wrote Hamilton. “It’s not just about one person’s fall from grace; it’s about holding everyone to a standard of compassion and consistency, especially when they possess significant influence.” Representatives for Hamilton and Nicki Minaj did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone’s requests for comment.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Year of Media Capture

Donald Trump speaks to members of press aboard Air Force One

Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images

Trump’s Year of Media Capture

This was the year when public broadcasting was gutted and hyper-partisans prospered, when the First Amendment was exhaustively praised and opportunistically abandoned. It was the year when media capture came to America.

Before 2025, “media capture” was a term used exclusively overseas, describing the compromise of a free press to curry favor with the regime in power. Sometimes this happened through threats and intimidation, greased by partisan group think. Other times, the cudgel was money: wealthy administration allies would buy independent news organizations and neuter them to fall in line with the state-backed version of facts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

One of the odder features of American journalism is that the columnists who hold themselves out as “fact checkers” and review claims made by politicians — calling balls, strikes, and “pinocchios” — are unusually terrible at it.

Fact checkers offered up several botched reviews of content from the Democratic National Convention, but nothing has broken their brains like Democrats’ sustained attacks on Donald Trump over Republicans’ anti-abortion agenda, which is laid out in gory detail in conservatives’ Project 2025 policy roadmap. 

Keep ReadingShow less