Skip to content
Search

Ariana Madix Wants Out of Raquel Leviss ‘Revenge Porn’ Lawsuit, Denies Sharing Video

Ariana Madix Wants Out of Raquel Leviss ‘Revenge Porn’ Lawsuit, Denies Sharing Video

Vanderpump Rules star Ariana Madix is adamant she never shared the “intimate” video of Raquel Leviss that she copied from her former boyfriend Tom Sandoval’s phone, so she’s asking a judge to release her from the revenge porn lawsuit that Leviss filed against Madix and Sandoval in February.

In new court filings obtained by Rolling Stone, Madix says she only sent snippets of the NSFW video directly to Leviss the night she discovered the recording because she was upset and wanted to confront her VPR co-star over the alleged affair that became the cultural phenomenon known as “Scandoval.”


“I did not send the videos to anyone else. Nor did I share, display, or show the videos to anyone else,” Madix wrote in a sworn declaration filed late Friday with her motion to strike the claims against her. She recalled sending the videos with a text that read, “you’re dead to me,” and included a copy of the text chain with Leviss as an exhibit. “I did not send the videos to anyone else. Nor did I share, display, or show the videos to anyone else,” Madix wrote. She claimed that Sandoval “forcibly grabbed” her phone a short time later and deleted the videos.

Madix said that “minutes later,” she texted her friend Logan Cochran about what happened and told him she no longer had the videos. “Tom took my phone and deleted them,” she wrote, according to a reproduction of the text chain included as another exhibit.

Her lawyers wrote in her motion that Madix was protected by her constitutional right to free speech when she subsequently discussed the video with family and friends. “Notwithstanding Ms. Madix’s discretion and restraint, plaintiff alleges in the complaint that Ms. Madix should have done absolutely nothing after discovering the messages and sexually explicit video between her life partner and plaintiff. If plaintiff had her way, Ms. Madix would not have told anyone about the affair or the video. But, because Ms. Madix did share such information — as is her right — plaintiff seeks to punish her and blame Ms. Madix for the negative reaction plaintiff received as a result of her affair with Mr. Sandoval,” the new filing states.

With her new motion, Madix is asking a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge to strike all three of the claims lodged against her in the lawsuit: revenge porn, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Sandoval also is facing those three claims in addition to a fourth one for alleged eavesdropping related to the initial recording. Sandoval filed a separate challenge to the lawsuit last week, calling it “vague” and deficient, adding that Leviss’ own conduct was “open and ostentatious” in the context of a voluntary reality TV show scrutinizing her private life.

“The only thing more laughable than the motion itself is the idea that Ariana supposedly just picked up the phone and magically got into it and found this on her way to the bathroom. The whole story is ludicrous,” Leviss’ lawyer Mark Geragos tells Rolling Stone, echoing the suggestion in Leviss’ lawsuit that Madix and Sandoval concocted the video incident to “leverage” the affair for a dramatic storyline for Vanderpump Rules. (In a notable twist, Sandoval’s lawyer is Matthew Geragos, the brother of Mark Geragos. The attorneys are from different law firms.)

In her original 19-page complaint, Leviss, whose real name is Rachel Leviss, claimed that Sandoval “surreptitiously recorded” her “in a state of undress and engaged in sex acts” as they embarked on a romantic relationship purportedly behind the back of Madix. The lawsuit alleged that back in March 2023, Madix took the “sexually explicit videos” obtained from Sandoval’s phone and “distributed them to others” in an alleged act of “revenge porn.”

As fans of the highly addictive Bravo reality show know, video of the FaceTime call is credited with exposing Sandoval and Leviss’ affair, leading to sky-high ratings for the show. According to Madix’s new filing, she found the video on Sandoval’s phone after his device slid out of his pocket while he was performing with his cover band at a club in West Hollywood, Calif. She wrote in her declaration that someone handed her the phone for safekeeping and that her “woman’s intuition” led her to check the device, which she easily accessed because she already knew the code. Madix says she was “shocked” to find a recording of the call while scanning the phone alone in a bathroom stall. “I hurriedly took out my own phone and made two recordings of the FaceTime video. Prior to that moment,
I considered plaintiff a friend and did not know that she and Mr. Sandoval were having an affair,” Madix wrote.

In her lawsuit, Leviss said she found the story of how Madix obtained the video suspect, but she was clear she believed Madix shared the videos with members of the Vanderpump Rules cast as well as people working for the show. “Leviss has suffered grave emotional, psychological, financial and reputational harm as a result of Madix’s distribution, dissemination, and publicization of the illicit videos,” the lawsuit said. Leviss said she was “humiliated and villainized” thanks to the actions of Sandoval and Madix. She accused the pair of acting with “malice,” meaning they should be held liable for punitive damages “to deter such conduct in the future.”

“To be clear, Leviss has repeatedly acknowledged that her actions were morally objectionable and hurtful to Madix. She has offered numerous apologies. There is more to the story, however,” Leviss’ lawsuit said. “Lost in the mix was that Leviss was a victim of the predatory and dishonest behavior of an older man, who recorded sexually explicit videos of her without her knowledge or consent, which were then distributed, disseminated and discussed publicly by a scorned woman seeking vengeance, catalyzing the scandal. Leviss ultimately checked herself into a mental health facility and remained there for three months while Bravo, Evolution and the cast milked the interest her excoriation had peaked.”

Leviss further claimed that she was in a “vulnerable state” while filming for the show and that she was “encouraged” by producers to drink alcohol. Leviss said in her suit that she started sleeping with Sandoval in August 2022, and she claimed that Madix knew about it before she found the video on Sandoval’s phone. She alleges Vanderpump Rules was on the verge of being canceled around this time, as prior plots had “grown stale,” and that Sandoval and Madix “had every incentive” to “leverage” the affair into “the storyline that Vanderpump Rules so desperately needed.”

Madix denies any wrongdoing and is asking not only to be stricken from the lawsuit but for Leviss to cover her related legal fees. The next hearing in the case is set for May 24.

More Stories

Marketer Behind Fake Quotes in ‘Megalopolis’ Trailer Dropped by Lionsgate

Marketer Behind Fake Quotes in ‘Megalopolis’ Trailer Dropped by Lionsgate

Eddie Egan, a very real marketing consultant, lost his gig with Lionsgate this week after the studio discovered that quotes he used in a trailer for Francis Ford Coppola’s Megalopolis were fabricated, according to Variety.

The conceit behind the teaser, which Lionsgate recalled on Wednesday, was that critics had trashed Coppola’s masterpieces throughout the decades, so why trust them? Except that the critics quoted didn’t actually write any of the pith. A quote attributed to Pauline Kael that was said to have run in The New Yorker, claiming The Godfather was “diminished by its artsiness,” never ran.

Keep ReadingShow less
Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

When George Lucas debuted his science fiction epic about a galaxy far far away in 1977, Star Wars went from a long-shot space opera into the highest grossing science fiction franchise of all time. Almost 50 years and one sale to entertainment conglomerate Disney later, Star Wars isn’t just a one-off world. There have been prequels, reboots, stand-alone television series, and an in-depth theme park addition. But like most popular culture, the Star Wars fandom, especially online, has become inundated with loud, conservative, and in some cases, incredibly racist voices. While Disney has never said these voices are directly impacting what shows get made, the vocal minority of Star Wars devotees keep limiting what they’ll accept as true Star Wars. These fans say they’re fighting for Star Wars’ future. But if their endless fantasy world can’t accept any stories that they don’t recognize — some of the self-professed biggest fans in all the worlds could be closing themselves off to any future at all. What is crystal (kyber?) clear is that before Star Wars can have another successful show, the loudest voices online need to realize the Star Wars they want to return to never existed in the first place. Will the real Star Wars please stand up? 

Much of the online discourse around Star Wars has centered on the franchise’s most recent live action projects. First premiering in 2019, these include The MandalorianThe Book of Boba Fett, Ahsoka, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Andor, and The Acolyte. The market has been oversaturated with stories, especially many that occur within the same time frames, with fans frankly, getting tired and in some cases — outright bored. Each of the projects has had its own reception — and own problems. However the low audience scores, angry YouTube rants, and long Reddit threads can really boil down to one question: who determines what’s real Star Wars? First as a film, and then a trilogy, Star Wars established early on to viewers that even when they were focused on a set of powerful twins and a dark Empire, shit was going down on literally every other planet. This freedom has allowed for endless story arcs across decades. But while opportunities have been endless — the patience of fans hasn’t. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Bob Mould and Fred Armisen Help the 8G Band Sign Off ‘Seth Meyers’ With Hüsker Dü Cover

Bob Mould and Fred Armisen Help the 8G Band Sign Off ‘Seth Meyers’ With Hüsker Dü Cover

Bob Mould and Fred Armisen helped the 8G Band close out their tenure as the Late Night With Seth Meyers house band last night.

Mould fronted the group as they tore through a cover of Hüsker Dü’s classic, “Makes No Sense At All,” from the pioneering punk group’s 1985 album Flip Your Wig. Armisen, meanwhile, took his spot behind the drums and belted backing vocals alongside keyboardist Eli Janney, guitarist Seth Jabour, and bassist Syd Butler.

Keep ReadingShow less
J Balvin to Make Acting Debut in Crime Drama About a Fishing Village-Turned-Smuggling Hub

J Balvin to Make Acting Debut in Crime Drama About a Fishing Village-Turned-Smuggling Hub

J Balvin will make his big screen debut as an Interpol investigator digging into a drug smuggling operation in the upcoming film, Little Lorraine, according to Variety

The film appears to be loosely based on real events in the Eighties, and will chronicle how a far-flung fishing and mining village in Nova Scotia became a hub for cocaine smuggling. Balvin’s Interpol investigator is drawn up north while investigating a Colombian drug ring suspected of moving product through the area.

Keep ReadingShow less
Watch Jon Stewart Recap the Democratic National Convention: ‘What a Night for Kamala Harris’

Watch Jon Stewart Recap the Democratic National Convention: ‘What a Night for Kamala Harris’

Kamala Harris accepted the Democrats’ nomination for president last night at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, but not without some commentary from Republican nominee Donald Trump. Jon Stewart had some thoughts about all of it as he broadcast The Daily Show live from the DNC, ultimately concluding that Trump has “morphed into a poor man’s cat turd.”

During the episode, Stewart started off by addressing the disappointment from fans that Beyoncé didn’t show at the convention. Joking that there would be a special guest, he showed a clip of Michigan rep Elissa Slotkin at the DNC. “You thought it was Beyoncé because everyone thought that it was going to be Beyoncé coming out there, but it was Slotkin all along,” Steward confirmed. “Everybody knew.”

Keep ReadingShow less