Skip to content
Search

Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

One of the odder features of American journalism is that the columnists who hold themselves out as “fact checkers” and review claims made by politicians — calling balls, strikes, and “pinocchios” — are unusually terrible at it.


Fact checkers offered up several botched reviews of content from the Democratic National Convention, but nothing has broken their brains like Democrats’ sustained attacks on Donald Trump over Republicans’ anti-abortion agenda, which is laid out in gory detail in conservatives’ Project 2025 policy roadmap. 

The former president has actively attempted to run away from Project 2025, because the policy goals laid out in the 887-page blueprint are deeply unpopular. Trump has claimed, “I know nothing about Project 2025, [and] I have no idea who is behind it.” On Thursday, he again claimed to “HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH” it.

It’s an absurd claim: The policy manual was written in large part by former top Trump administration officials — and when he spoke at a 2022 event hosted by the Heritage Foundation, the think tank behind Project 2025, Trump said: “This is a great group, and they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.”

As Rolling Stone has reported, sources say that Trump has been directly briefed by confidants and close aides on Project 2025’s substance and progress. Top officials involved with the project are expected to have senior roles in a Trump administration. 

Instead of fact checking Trump’s clearly false claim that he knows nothing about Project 2025, fact checkers have decided they — and everyone else — must simply take him at his word. Further, Democrats must be punished for tying Trump to its unpopular policy proposals.  

The Poynter Institute’s Politifact already beclowned itself earlier in the week by declaring it was unfair of the DNC to broadcast a video of Trump from 2016 saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for people who have abortions, because he “walked back the comment.”

On Thursday, Politifact’s staff reviewed Vice President Kamala Harris’ claim that Trump “plans to create a national anti-abortion coordinator and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions.” 

Politifact deemed Harris’ claim “mostly false” because Project 2025 “isn’t Trump’s plan,” adding that “Trump and his campaign have repeatedly said they were not involved in the project and Trump is not listed as an author, editor, or contributor.”

It’s hard to say how inappropriate this is, but things quickly got worse.

“Project 2025 doesn’t mention a ‘national anti-abortion coordinator.’ The document calls for a ‘pro-life politically appointed Senior Coordinator of the Office of Women, Children, and Families,’” Politifact wrote. “It says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s abortion surveillance and maternal mortality reporting systems are inadequate and proposes withholding federal money from states that don’t report to the CDC how many abortions take place in their states.”

These are virtually the same things.

The article also pans Harris’ supposedly “predictive” claim that Trump wants to “enact a nationwide abortion ban,” noting that “Trump said this year he would not sign a national ban.” This is true — but shortly before the former president announced that abortion should be a state issue, he openly mulled endorsing a national abortion ban. 

It’s obviously worth considering, too, that Trump appointed three conservative Supreme Court justices whose votes were essential to overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban abortion — an accomplishment he openly brags about. 

Politifact concludes that Harris “exaggerates Trump’s abortion agenda by tying him to Project 2025 ‘allies.’”

Is it really a journalist’s job to declare with certainty that the issue position Trump has settled on, as a matter of politics, is exactly what he would do as president? Absolutely not. It’s even more irresponsible coming from pundits holding themselves out as “fact checkers.” 

If that is indeed their job, they should throw in the towel.

More Stories

Bernie Sanders Recruits Neil Young and Maggie Rogers for Benefit Album

Bernie Sanders Recruits Neil Young and Maggie Rogers for Benefit Album

Bernie Sanders is bringing together an eclectic (and elite) group of musicians for a benefit compilation inspired by his political campaign against corporate influence in American democracy. The forthcoming record, Take America Back: The Fight Oligarchy Album, features Neil Young, Joan Baez, Maggie Rogers, Carole King and a roster of artists spanning several generations of American music.

Keep ReadingShow less
100 Unhinged Things Trump Did That You May Have Forgotten

Donald Trump bangs a gavel after signing the "Big Beautiful Bill Act," on July 4, 2025.

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/POOL/AFP/Getty Images

100 Unhinged Things Trump Did That You May Have Forgotten

“Flood the zone with shit.”

Keep ReadingShow less
58-Year-Old Republican Blames Sending Unsolicited Nudes on ‘Youthful Indiscretion’

Sen. Brent Taylor on Oct. 10, 2026, in Clarksville, Tenn.

George Walker IV/AP

58-Year-Old Republican Blames Sending Unsolicited Nudes on ‘Youthful Indiscretion’

Brent Taylor, a Tennessee state senator running to represent the state’s 9th District in the House of Representatives, is currently weathering one of the sillier sex scandals in recent years, mounting a novel defense against allegations that he sent unsolicited nudes to women as recently as 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Republicans Are Driving the Most Racist Election Cycle in a Generation

Donald Trump looks to an image of Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed during a campaign rally on Sunday, Oct. 25, 2026, in Port Huron, Mich.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

Republicans Are Driving the Most Racist Election Cycle in a Generation

In 2010, a splinter group of far-right Republicans known as the Tea Party summoned a red wave of Republican voters in Barack Obama’s first midterm elections, capitalizing on the remnants of the global financial crisis and troop surges in Afghanistan to help the GOP win 63 seats in Congress. The Tea Party wanted to be known as fiscal conservatives, but their darkest power was abject, open fury that the United States had dared to elect a Black man as president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Russia Envoy Praises Putin as a Great ‘Humanitarian’

In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Vladimir Putin speaks with Steve Witkoff during their meeting in Saint Petersburg, on Oct. 21, 2026.

Gavriil GRIGOROV/POOL/AFP/Getty Images

Trump’s Russia Envoy Praises Putin as a Great ‘Humanitarian’

If Donald Trump is the greatest peacemaker in presidential history, then Vladimir Putin is the world’s greatest humanitarian, at least according to White House envoy Steve Witkoff.

Keep ReadingShow less