Skip to content
Search

Donald Trump Is a Convicted Criminal. Will He Still Be President?

Donald Trump Is a Convicted Criminal. Will He Still Be President?

For the first time in history, a former president and current presidential candidate has been convicted of a felony. But will he still win the election?

How very 2024: Donald Trump shatters all precedents, breaks all boundaries for what a president can do or say, and yet here we are wondering whether it will even matter.


The good news is that according to every survey that’s been done this year, it will.

First, a quick refresher: In July 2006, Donald Trump met adult film actress and director Stormy Daniels (real name: Stephanie Clifford) at a golf tournament. Trump, who was newly married to his wife, Melania, invited Daniels to dinner, then had sex with her in his hotel suite.

It was a quickie, according to Daniels’ testimony; she wasn’t physically or verbally threatened, but she also felt that she couldn’t really say no to such a powerful man. Still, Daniels kept the story to herself, and went on with her life.

Flash forward 10 years, and Trump is running for president. Daniels begins to shop her story around — whether for money or justice — but gets little interest. But then came the leak of the infamous 2005 Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump is heard bragging that if you’re famous, you can just “grab [women] by the pussy.” Suddenly, the Stormy Daniels affair is a real problem for Trump’s 2016 campaign.

And so Trump dispatched his fixer, Michael Cohen, to buy her silence — ultimately agreeing to pay her $130,000. To conceal the deal, the expense was listed as a “legal expense,” and the deal was done in a convoluted way. Trump lied, in other words, to hide his affair and the hush-money payment to protect his presidential bid.

On Thursday, he was found guilty of doing that — 34 counts of “falsifying business records,” to be precise. This has never happened before in American history.

Will it matter? So far, the answer appears to be yes.

In an April survey from CNN, 24 percent of Trump supporters said they “might reconsider” their support for him if he was convicted of a crime. And in a May poll by Emerson College, 25 percent percent of voters said that a guilty verdict in New York would make them less likely to vote for Trump. 

In three recent polls, Trump went from leading by one percentage point when people were asked simply, “who will you vote for,” to trailing by six points when they were asked, “who will you vote for, if Trump is convicted.”

And let’s remember that, at the moment, this is an extremely close election. Journalists find this exasperating, because we’re focused on Trump’s terrifying promises — here’s a list of them — to begin mass deportations, use the Justice Department to go after political opponents, immediately reverse all of President Joe Biden’s actions on climate change, replace civil servants with political lackeys, do away with any restraint on Israel’s war in Gaza, ban abortion, and so on.

But most people are focused on what they’re usually focused on: the economy. And for whatever reason, they think Trump will do a better job with it than Biden.

That dynamic may have changed today. It’s one thing for liberals to accuse Trump of being an anti-democratic criminal — it’s quite another for a jury of 12 regular people to convict him. And while paying off a porn star isn’t of the same seriousness as, you know, inciting a riot in which people stormed the Capitol and assaulted cops, it’s a story that regular people can easily understand.

He cheated on his wife, fucked a porn star, paid her off to keep her quiet, and lied to the government and the American people about it so he could win the 2016 election. That is not going to play well on Main Street.

In a way, this case is actually more compelling than the Jan. 6 cases, as a matter of electoral politics. Even if you think Trump might tackle inflation better than Biden (don’t get me started on how false that actually is), the guy just got convicted of a tawdry, sleazy crime. And now he wants to be president? How are you going to explain that to your kids?

Now, don’t get too excited — Trump will probably not go to prison. First, he’s going to appeal this conviction immediately. Second, while the felonies he’s committed could theoretically get him prison time, that would be highly unusual in a case like this. Ultimately, it’s a financial crime: falsifying business records. For someone with no prior convictions, prison time in this kind of case would be excessive.

The conviction is also not going to persuade any of Trump’s true believers. Much of the MAGA movement is made up of Christian Nationalist extremists, and the rest are inhabiting a media bubble in which all of this was a frame job, and Trump is being politically persecuted. Your racist uncle who rants about Trump on Facebook — he’s not changing his mind.

But your racist uncle isn’t going to decide the election. The MAGA faithful were already highly motivated to turn out on Election Day; their support is baked in. The people this verdict might affect are the centrists: moderates who might vote for Trump for economic or other reasons, but who don’t believe the far-right’s conspiracy theories that this is all some kind of setup. 

These are people who were holding their nose to vote for Trump, either for the economy or because they have conservative social or political views and dread four more years of Biden.

And to them, this conviction will stink. No matter how much you’re holding your nose, the stench of Trump still gets through. That’s why this verdict matters — because for the people still sitting on the fence, the whole thing reeks.

More Stories

The Rise of the Digital Oligarchy
Illustration by Matthew Cooley. Photographs in illustration by Julia Demaree Nikhinson/POOL/AFP/Getty Images; The White House; Adobe Stock

The Rise of the Digital Oligarchy

On Jan. 11, 1994, I drove to UCLA’s Royce Hall to hear Vice President Al Gore deliver the keynote address at the Information Superhighway Conference. I was in the early stages of building Intertainer, which would become one of the first video-on-demand companies. The 2,000 people crowded into that auditorium did not know it, but they were crossing a threshold. The roster of speakers read like a who’s who of industrial power: TCI’s John Malone, Rupert Murdoch, Sony’s Michael Schulhof, Barry Diller of QVC. These were among the richest and most commanding figures in American communications. Today, their combined force and fortunes are a rounding error beside Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Jensen Huang, Jeff Bezos, and Marc Andreessen. The world the Hollywood moguls walked back out into would not, in any meaningful sense, be the world they had left.

Gore’s UCLA speech now reads like a confident moment in the early‑Clinton fantasia of managed modernization: the assumption that a lightly guided market, properly “incentivized,” could be coaxed into building a new civic commons. He framed the whole project as a public utility constructed with private capital, insisting that “the nation needs private investment to complete the construction of the National Information Infrastructure. And competition is the single most critical means of encouraging that private investment.” What is striking, in retrospect, is not the technophilia but the blithe certainty that “competition” would safeguard pluralism and access, that state‑designed market rules would prevent the emergence of bottlenecks and private tollbooths. The actual trajectory of the internet — toward a stack dominated at each layer by a handful of firms from carriers to platforms to ad brokers — renders the scene almost allegorical: an administration hymning competition as the guarantor of openness while midwifing, in practice, the consolidated, quasi‑monopolistic order that would eventually narrow and privatize the very public sphere it imagined itself to be creating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bernie Sanders and AOC Want to Pump the Brakes on AI Development

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in April 2025.

Natalie Behring/Getty Images

Bernie Sanders and AOC Want to Pump the Brakes on AI Development

Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are announcing their support for two new AI bills aimed at putting a federal moratorium on the constructions of data centers. Sanders is introducing his bill, the AI Data Center Moratorium Act, on Wednesday.

“AI and robotics are creating the most sweeping technological revolution in the history of humanity. Congress is way behind where it should be in understanding the nature of this revolution and its impacts,” Sanders says in a statement to Rolling Stone. “We cannot sit back and allow a handful of billionaire Big Tech oligarchs to make decisions that will reshape our economy, our democracy and the future of humanity. We need serious public debate and democratic oversight over this enormously consequential issue.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Top Trump Official Resigns Over Iran War: ‘No Imminent Threat’

Joe Kent, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, testifies on Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2025.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images

Top Trump Official Resigns Over Iran War: ‘No Imminent Threat’

The director of the National Counterterrorism Center resigned from his post on Tuesday in protest of Donald Trump’s ongoing war against Iran. Joe Kent, a former Army Ranger and CIA paramilitary officer, announced that he “cannot in good conscience support” the war, and that Iran was not an imminent threat to the United States, which the president and his administration have claimed in order to justify attacking the nation.

“Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby,” Kent wrote in a statement released through his office and circulated on social media. “As a veteran who deployed to combat 11 times and as a Gold Star husband who lost my beloved wife Shannon in a war manufactured by Israel, I cannot support sending the next generation off to fight and die in a war that serves no benefit to the American people nor justifies the cost of American lives.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Says Iran War Is Both ‘Very Complete’ But Also Just ‘the Beginning’

President Donald Trump at the Republican Members Issues Conference in Florida on March 9, as the war in Iran continues

Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images

Trump Says Iran War Is Both ‘Very Complete’ But Also Just ‘the Beginning’

As the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran escalates, President Donald Trump and his Cabinet have offered a litany of dizzying updates on the conflict.

During a phone interview with CBS News on Monday, Trump said the war with Iran is “very complete, pretty much.” Speaking from his Doral, Florida, golf club, the president claimed “[Iran has] no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force. Their missiles are down to a scatter. Their drones are being blown up all over the place, including their manufacturing of drones.” He added, “If you look, they have nothing left. There’s nothing left in a military sense.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Fires Kristi Noem, Taps Oklahoma Senator to Lead DHS

Kristi Noem testifies before the House Judiciary Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on March 4, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Trump Fires Kristi Noem, Taps Oklahoma Senator to Lead DHS

After weeks of public scrutiny, personal scandal, and bad press over her handling of the Department of Homeland Security, President Donald Trump has fired Secretary Kristi Noem, tapping Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin as her potential replacement.

Noem is the first member of Trump’s second-term Cabinet to be removed from their position. In a statement posted to Truth Social on Thursday, Trump wrote that he was “pleased to announce that the Highly Respected United States Senator from the Great State of Oklahoma, Markwayne Mullin, will become the United States Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS), effective March 31, 2026.”

Keep ReadingShow less