Skip to content
Search

Judge Revives Marilyn Manson Sex-Assault Lawsuit by Ex-Assistant

Ashley Walters convinced a judge that California’s new two-year revival window for otherwise time-barred claims of sexual assault applies to her claims

Judge Revives Marilyn Manson Sex-Assault Lawsuit by Ex-Assistant
Paul Bergen/Redferns/Getty Images

A California judge has revived an ex-assistant’s sexual assault lawsuit against the musician Marilyn Manson, reversing his own dismissal of the case last month after concluding that a newly enacted state law applies.

“I looked at this closely,” Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steve Cochran said at a Monday morning hearing. “I do think the statute revives the claim. You’re [heading toward trial] all over again.”


Judge Cochran vacated his Dec. 16 dismissal of the long-running case and granted the former assistant, Ashley Walters, the right to re-file her complaint using the new law, known as AB 250. He set a follow-up hearing for March 27. Manson’s lawyer, Howard King, told Rolling Stone after the hearing that the rocker, whose legal name is Brian Warner, would appeal.

“Ashley Walters has been given the right to pursue a narrow claim of sexual assault under the newly enacted law, a claim that will not survive the next motion for summary judgment,” King says in a statement. “The undeniable fact is that Mr. Warner never committed any sexual assault.”

Walters’ lawsuit has been working its way through the courts for several years. A different judge dismissed it as untimely in May 2022, but an appellate panel later revived it, giving Walters a chance to prove that trauma-induced memory suppression delayed her filing. When Judge Cochran dismissed the case again last month, he found that she failed to make that showing. Under AB 250, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October, adult survivors of alleged sexual assault have a new two-year lookback window to bring claims that would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations.

In filings ahead of the Monday hearing, Warner’s lawyers argued that Walters missed her chance to invoke AB 250. They also claimed the new law only revives allegations of sexual assault that would qualify as crimes under California’s penal code. They claim Walters’ allegations fall short of that standard.

“That’s an insane argument,” Kate McFarlane with the firm Hadsel, Stormer, Renick & Dai tells Rolling Stone after the hearing. “It’s a desperate attempt by the defense to avoid accountability. The law is very clearly in our favor.”

Walters first sued Warner in 2021. She alleged that in 2010, after the musician contacted her on social media to compliment her photography, he invited her to his home studio to discuss a possible collaboration. According to the lawsuit, he pushed her onto a bed, pinned her arms, tried to kiss her, bit her ear, and forced her hand into his underwear. She said she moved away and left the location.

Walters later accepted a job as Warner’s assistant, the lawsuit says. During that period, she alleges, he subjected her to physical and emotional abuse, including whipping her, throwing plates at her, forcing her to stand on a chair for extended periods, and throwing her into a wall during what she described as drug-fueled rages.

Under California criminal law, a sexual battery includes forcing someone who is unlawfully restrained to touch an intimate part of another person for sexual gratification. McFarlane argued Monday that Walters’ allegations met that penal code definition. She said AB 250 also permits Walters to revive related claims of sexual harassment and wrongful termination.

Judge Cochran signaled Monday he would allow Warner to file a new summary judgment motion to challenge the viability of Walters’ claims under AB 250. Walters’ lawyers had asked him to treat the issue as settled and move directly to trial, but the judge said the case would essentially reset to the phase just after discovery.

In her lawsuit, Walters alleges that beyond her purported direct abuse at the hands of Warner, she also purportedly witnessed the musician throw a prop skull at his former fiancée, Evan Rachel Wood, “so hard” that it allegedly left “a large, raised welt on her stomach.” She claims she also would sneak food and drinks to Warner’s “starving and distraught” girlfriends while they hid in a guest bathroom. Warner has denied the allegations.

Walters first stepped forward in February 2021 as multiple women, including Wood, accused Warner of physical and emotional abuse. Rolling Stone conducted a lengthy investigation in 2021, speaking with more than 55 sources about the allegations. Warner, 57, reached out-of-court settlements with two of his accusers, including actress Esmé Bianco. He previously decided to abandon claims of defamation and harassment that he filed against Wood.

More Stories

Harry Styles, Arctic Monkeys, Wizkid and Asake, and All the Songs You Need to Know This Week
Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Harry Styles

Harry Styles, Arctic Monkeys, Wizkid and Asake, and All the Songs You Need to Know This Week

Welcome to our weekly rundown of the best new music — featuring big singles, key tracks from our favorite albums, and more. This week, Harry Styles makes a glittering pivot to the discotheque, Arctic Monkeys return with a swaying charity single, and Wizkid and Asake unite for a sleek highlight from their collaborative EP. Plus, new music from Snail Mail, Lucinda Williams, Jessie Ware, Dermot Kennedy, The New Pornographers, Holly Humberstone, and Underscores.

Harry Styles, “Aperture” (YouTube)

Keep ReadingShow less
Fugees’ Pras Michel Denied Bail As He Appeals Foreign Influence Conviction, 14-Year Sentence

Fugees’ Pras Michel Denied Bail As He Appeals Foreign Influence Conviction, 14-Year Sentence

Fugees rapper Pras Michel failed to convince his trial judge that he should remain free on bail while he appeals his conviction and resulting 14-year prison sentence in his money laundering, illegal lobbying, and witness tampering case.

In a Thursday ruling, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said Michel was convicted of 10 offenses more than two years ago, and his motion for bail pending appeal didn’t meet the burden required to overcome the presumption that he should be detained. But in a small victory for the musician, the judge agreed to delay Michel’s surrender date by two months so he could appeal the bail issue at the federal circuit court level.

Keep ReadingShow less
Palomosa 2026 annouces new dates and MGMT as headliner
Palomosa*

Palomosa 2026 annouces new dates and MGMT as headliner

The Palomosa festival is already starting to reveal details about its third edition. After taking place in September in 2024 and 2025, the 2026 edition will now be held in mid-May, from May 14 to 16.

As news rarely comes alone, it has also been announced that New York band MGMT will be in the spotlight on May 15. The duo, known for hits such as Kids, Time to Pretend and Electric Feel, will perform in a DJ set format.

Keep ReadingShow less
Is the Touring Business Broken for Indie Acts?
Griffin Lotz for Rolling Stone

Is the Touring Business Broken for Indie Acts?

Dry Cleaning had big plans for January 2026. The English band spent much of the past two years making their third and best album, Secret Love, which brings their uniquely beguiling mix of post-punk and art-rock styles to a new creative peak. Now, with the album’s release set for early this month on 4AD, they were preparing to launch a 21-date tour of North America, historically a strong market for the band, with a Jan. 23 show in Chicago.

Ticket sales were looking good, and the band was feeling excited. But their U.S. visas hadn’t come through yet, months after they got their applications in. Soon they were facing thousands of dollars in expediting fees, on top of the already high costs of mounting a tour of that size. “I started to look at it and I was like, ‘I’m a little bit worried about cash flow,’” says their manager, Tim Hampson. “There were just too many variables starting to stack in a way that made me feel extremely uncomfortable.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Drake Appeals Dismissal of ‘Not Like Us’ Defamation Case, Calls Ruling ‘Dangerous’
Simone Joyner/Getty Images for ABA

Drake Appeals Dismissal of ‘Not Like Us’ Defamation Case, Calls Ruling ‘Dangerous’

Three months after a federal judge dismissed Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group, the superstar rapper and his lawyers filed an opening appellate brief Wednesday that seeks to overturn the ruling and revive his bid for damages over Kendrick Lamar’s Grammy-winning diss track, “Not Like Us.”

In the new 60-page brief obtained by Rolling Stone, Drake argues that Lamar’s track states, as an “unambiguous matter of fact,” that he is a “certified pedophile.” He also claims Universal Music Group “relentlessly” marketed the song in a way that misled consumers and caused him serious harm. The brief contends that the allegation carries a “precise” and readily understood meaning that is “capable of being proven true or false,” a point the district court previously acknowledged, according to the filing.

Keep ReadingShow less