Baby Nova created a universe where emotional honesty, theatrical instinct, and internet-age fragmentation all coexist.
Though she once trained in the physically demanding world of high-level circus performance, her music feels less rooted in spectacle than in exposure. Across her work, intimacy and discomfort sit side by side, with lyrics that move between confession, provocation, and self-interrogation. Rather than smoothing those tensions out, she leans into them, allowing contradictions to become part of the experience.
Her songs pull from vintage palettes and contemporary language, creating music that feels untethered from a single era while remaining deeply connected to the emotional realities of her generation. In conversation, she speaks openly about preserving ambiguity, protecting privacy within autobiographical writing, and rejecting the idea that art should always arrive fully explained.
You come from a background in intense physical performance. Has that changed the way you approach music compared to artists who haven’t performed in that way?
I’m assuming you mean my time doing Cirque. I will say it has not had an impact on my music career at all, and in fact I’ve lost most of those skills, minus juggling, which I can still do.
Cirque is the kind of thing you really have to keep up with or you lose the muscles required to do it. It’s a very different type of performance than music, although both at times feel like falling from the ceiling without a harness.
Do you see your music as an extension of your body, or more as a constructed version of yourself?
I see my music as more true to myself than perhaps my social personality. I’m very socially shy, so I tend to mask a lot or restrain my thoughts and feelings, whereas in my music I’m able to express myself more fully.
I have a trick when I’m writing where I’ll say, “Okay, so this happened. How does that make you feel?” I’ll write down my first answer, which is usually some bullshit answer about how I think I’m supposed to feel. Then I’ll ask, “Okay, but how do you actually feel?” It’s simple, but it’s helped me get more in tune with my unfiltered feelings.
I think the pursuit of honesty in music is so important because the songs that have been canon moments in my life are when the artist finally says the scary part out loud.
There’s a strong internet-era dimension in your themes. Do you feel like you’re creating from within that culture, or reacting to it?
I think it’s a mix. I’m less engaged in internet culture than a lot of people my age. I’m a little internet-averse, unfortunately. But it’s shaping language, and I like to talk in my songs the way I would in real life, so naturally the internet era bleeds through my writing.
Some of it is intentional, though. I pull a lot sonically from a Dusty in Memphis palette and more vintage-feeling sounds in general, so it was important to me that the music didn’t feel like a period piece. I consciously kept the lyrics contemporary.
Your songs often feel like fragments of a larger world. Are you consciously building a universe, or does that emerge naturally over time?
I think that naturally unfolds over time. I’m a very conceptually driven artist, but usually the concept finds itself. I’ll write most of the record, and the throughline will reveal itself somewhere toward the end.
A lot of emerging artists are pushed to simplify their work to scale faster. Do you feel pressure to make your music more legible, or is authenticity something you’re committed to keeping?
Yes. But I’m not listening to it and getting in a bit of trouble as a result.
I hear a lot of feedback like, “The lyric is just a little too provocative,” or “We don’t know where to put this.” But I take it as a compliment. I think it means I’m doing my job.
A lot of the artists I look up to were at some point considered not to have a clear category or genre, or were considered too provocative. I think that’s par for the course of creating something authentically you.
With an artistic identity so visually and conceptually defined, does it ever feel limiting, or does it give you a structure to push against?
Not so much. With every project cycle, there’s an opportunity to shift the visuals to match the record, and that’s exciting to me.
I used to stress all the time about the visuals and the music: “Does this record make sense with that record? Do these visuals feel like me?” Then I heard the best advice I’ve ever received, from a mentor of mine, Michael McCarty. He said, “Never underestimate yourself as the throughline of everything you do.”
From that point on, my only question became, “Do I like it, or do I not like it?” That was enough. I think it’s the most freeing sentence for the overthinking artist.
Are there things you intentionally leave unexplained in your work, even if clarifying them might make it more accessible?
Yes. I often write about pretty dark things that happened with specific people, and I find it important to edit out details that could shed too much light on who I’m speaking about.
I chose to be an artist, and it’s important to me to protect the privacy of people who didn’t choose that, whether I like them or not. It’s a tough line to walk in the pursuit of honesty, but there are things in life way more important than music, and people are one of them.

When someone hears your music for the first time, what do you want them to feel — not understand, but physically or emotionally experience?
Permission. Permission to feel angry, sad, a little twisted, vengeful, slutty — whatever they need to feel. I gave myself permission to feel what I needed to in writing this project, and I want that for other people when they listen to it.
Future of Music is about artists shaping what comes next. Do you think the future of music lies more in sound, visuals, or how the two collide?
I think the future of music is about to split into hyper-polished AI-driven music and the antithesis of it: less autotune, more raw and real instrumentation, more imperfections.
I’ll be on the latter side personally. I have no desire to use AI in my music. My problem with it isn’t that complex — I just find it very unromantic, and it doesn’t appeal to me.
Sound and visuals will always walk hand in hand. I think we’ll see more beautiful visuals around music, but in the music space, music will continue to drive it.
What role does mystery play in your work, in a moment where everything is expected to be documented and explained?
Unfortunately for me, mystery comes quite naturally because I’m incredibly shy. I’m at odds with social media right now. I love using it to connect with fans, but I personally don’t have this natural drive to post on the internet.
I personally adore a little mystery. It’s fun. I wonder sometimes, with the internet being so saturated, what would happen if an artist just didn’t have social media and managed to break through slowly through pure music discovery on YouTube, Apple Music, Spotify, and so on. I can hear marketing teams everywhere screaming, but I do think if you commit to the bit, it could work.
What are your thoughts on the future of music in Canada?Canada is so rich with talent and authentic new ideas. We’re lucky to live in a place that cultivates an environment of unique collaborations. I think we’ll see more Canadian artists breaking through globally and taking each other up along the way.













Courtesy Photo
Courtesy Photo

Liam Payne (left) and Harry Styles of One Direction onstage during the 2013 American Music Awards at Nokia Theatre L.A. Live on Nov. 24, 2013
Harry Styles Finds the Right Words on Liam Payne Tribute Song
For the past seven weeks, Harry Styles has reserved two minutes at each of his Madison Square Garden shows to reflect on the last time he gathered this many people in this room. Four years have passed since he performed 15 record-breaking nights at the venue during his Love on Tour. Now, every night at the new Together, Together shows, which span 30 nights at MSG, he acknowledges that “a lot of life happened to me and landed on me in ways that maybe it hadn’t before.”
Styles doesn’t usually go into much more detail; he typically just describes those in-between years as “a great reminder for me of just how wonderful and beautiful, difficult and inspiring, and also how fragile a life can be.” He encourages the audience to look around at each other and celebrate the community they’ve built together. Then he dives into “Sign of the Times.” It happens every Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday like clockwork. But when he delivered this speech on Friday, Oct. 16, there was a shift. It didn’t conclude in its usual way.
Instead, Styles turned his attention to the banner commemorating his 15 consecutive nights at the Garden in 2022. “It means a lot to be able to look up there at my name up there from the last tour,” he said. “There are so many people, friends and people that I’ve worked with, that I would’ve never been able to do this without.” Two years ago, he continued, he lost one of those pillars. Friday’s show fell on the same day as the second anniversary of the death of Liam Payne, a loss that time has not made it easier to acknowledge. “I’m sure a lot of you have been through something similar,” Styles said. “I hope you haven’t.”
A frequent assessment of Styles, both among his fans and those who’ve only encountered him at a distance, is that he often talks at length before getting to the point. He recognizes it himself on the Kiss All the Time. Disco, Occasionally song “Coming Up Roses,” where he sings about fumbling his words. But recently, comments about his long-winded way of speaking have started to feel like purposeful misreadings. There are clear and carefully considered thoughts present between his starts and stops. Anyone truly listening will pick up on those threads.
Styles cut himself off a few times during his speech on Friday. He tried to talk for a second about looking after each other, and repeated his point about the banner and the people who’ve supported him. He never mentions Payne by name, instead referring to him as a friend, which somehow became a point of criticism from some fans. The context is clear enough. Still, he seems to know it’s a gamble to expect understanding, especially when the conversation grows more complex and personal.
After about a minute and a half, Styles figured it best to show us what he means rather than tell us. “I’m gonna sing a song I wrote two years ago for my friend,” he said before premiering “Wise Enough.” The sullen tribute to Payne settled the room into a cool near-silence, punctured by quiet gasps and muffled crying. It was beautiful, devastating, and deeply exposing to watch Styles share his grief with 20,000 people in the best, and maybe only, way he knows how.
Earlier this year, Styles told Zane Lowe about the acute dread surrounding the expected performance of his mourning. “Full transparency, even the idea of talking about it, I struggle with that a little bit. There was a period when he passed away where I really struggled with acknowledging how strange it is to have people own part of your grief, in a way,” he said. “I have such strong feelings around my friend passing away. And then suddenly being aware there’s maybe a desire from other people of you to convey that in some way, or it means you’re not feeling what you’re feeling.”
Artists often describe the act of sharing new music as a change in ownership, something that is no longer their own once it has been handed over to an audience. “Wise Enough” feels protected from this. It would be confounding to see Styles ever record and release it in any official capacity. The song is openhearted in a way that exposes deep scars, anxious in a way that worries and fidgets about time and how it passes, and inconsolable in a way that doesn’t make the futile attempt to fight through anger, regret, or sadness.
“I can tell you what it’s like to bury friends on Wednesday nights/Gather in a garden around the fire,” Styles sings in a particularly cutting verse on the song, which concludes with an honest admission: “I’m not wise enough to call for a conversation/And then back it up, right?/Like you’re in the sky.”
Celebrity doesn’t obscure grief. It doesn’t come with a script for what to say when someone is sorry for your loss, or when they recollect their own version of the person you knew. No one really has the right words for these moments. Over the weekend, fans debated whether “Wise Enough” is actually titled “What Is Enough?” Styles introduced the record so briskly it was hard to decipher. The question of adequacy feels similarly impossible to answer.
Grief is so plain in how universal it is, but so complex in how and when it chooses to present itself. It can be policed only as much as it can be predicted, which is to say barely at all. That Styles let us into his now yearslong search for some semblance of understanding — knowing how his words have been picked apart before for far lesser things — shouldn’t be taken for granted.
Styles never acknowledges that banner at MSG. It’s not for lack of gratitude — he cried when it was unveiled. But the point he has reiterated every Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday since the end of August is that the achievement is something that must be shared because he couldn’t have done it alone. He talks about being on stage as if what happens in that room exists far beyond and outside of himself, something that endures even in his absence.
It’s true in a way. There’s muscle memory tied to the music. It’s in the spinning, dizzying way fans dance to “Satellite,” or the way they wildly kick their feet and make the building shake during “Kiwi,” a song he brought back to the set just for New York. It’s just like before, but still so different.
Friday night continued as usual after “Wise Enough.” Styles belted out “Sign of the Times” in the sobering way he always does, then “Aperture” let in a cathartic flood of strobing lights and pulsating beats. The emotional whiplash took physical form as fans consoled one another, holding out their hands to help up friends and strangers who crumbled to the floor at the conclusion of the tribute. Some were crushed by their memories of loving One Direction, and the care they hold in their hearts for Styles. Some were just as wrecked by their own personal losses.
A lot of life and loss can happen in four years, as Styles says each night. For some people who were at MSG on Friday, there are friends present in their memories from the last tour who are missing from the new ones they’re making. The lyric “You dance until you’re tired/No, you don’t, and now you never will/Will you?” surfaces their own devastation completely separate from what inspired Styles to sprawl those words on a page. How do you dance to “Aperture” — the beating heart of this show in its declaration that “we belong together” — after hearing something like that?
You take the hand of the friend or the stranger who pulled you from the ground and use it to lead each other back to the dance floor. When Styles talks about community and stresses the importance of caring for one another each night, he reminds everyone of the fragility of a moment, and urges them to cherish every second they get. To dance wildly and sing loudly and wrap their arms around each other. To hold tight to what’s here right now.
It’s all any of us have, so it has to be enough.