Skip to content
Search

FTC Will Prohibit Fake Reviews, Bot Followers to ‘Fight Deceptive Advertising’

FTC Will Prohibit Fake Reviews, Bot Followers to ‘Fight Deceptive Advertising’

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is taking action to prohibit “deceptive advertising.” On Wednesday, the organization announced that fake reviews, purchased followers, and suppression of reviews will be prohibited, and open to civic penalties.

The new rule — which was voted in favor of 5-0 — will disallow fake reviews and false reviews from folks with no experience with a business, and will prohibit businesses from selling reviews and companies from buying them.


“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” said FTC Chair Lina Khan in a press release.

The new ruling will prohibit companies from paying or incentivizing positive or negative consumer reviews, and from “buying fake indicators of social media influence,” including false followers or views generated by bots.

“By strengthening the FTC’s toolkit to fight deceptive advertising, the final rule will protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive,” added Khan.

Also included in the ruling is the prohibition of businesses from suppressing reviews, and will not allow workers at a company to either issue their own reviews or encourage immediate relatives of employees from posting positive reviews.

The proposed rule was announced in June 2023 and the FTC held an informal hearing on the ruling in February 2024. The new rule will become effective in 60 days following its officialization on Aug. 14.

“Case-by-case enforcement without civil penalty authority might not be enough to deter clearly deceptive review and testimonial practices,” read the FTC’s release, pointing to a Supreme Court decision that “hindered the FTC’s ability to seek monetary relief for consumers.”

“This rule will enhance deterrence and strengthen FTC enforcement actions,” the release added.

More Stories

Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions Overturned Due to ‘Jury Interference’

Alex Murdaugh during his trial for murder on Feb. 10, 2023.

TNS Joshua Boucher/The State/Tribune News Service/Getty Images

Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions Overturned Due to ‘Jury Interference’

South Carolina’s Supreme Court has overturned two murder convictions against Alex Murdaugh. The former attorney was sentenced to life in prison in 2023 after being found guilty of killing his wife and son on their family estate. At the time, the jury reached a unanimous decision. Now, the court has found Murdaugh did not receive a fair trial by an impartial jury due to interference from Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill.

The court maintains that Hill “egregiously attacked Murdaugh’s credibility and his defense, thus triggering the presumption of prejudice, which the State was unable to rebut.” A juror in the case reported Hill telling the jury “not to be fooled” by evidence presented by Murdaugh’s attorneys ahead of his testimony. In an affidavit, the juror said, “I had questions about Mr. Murdaugh’s guilt but voted guilty because I felt pressured by the other jurors.” She also stated her decision was influenced by Hill’s comments.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Grew Up With Jeffrey Epstein. Our Neighborhood Held Dark Secrets

Sea Gate, Brooklyn

Griffin Lotz

I Grew Up With Jeffrey Epstein. Our Neighborhood Held Dark Secrets

There was danger outside the gate, we understood that. You could see it.

Precariously balanced on the very tip of Coney Island, Sea Gate, where I was raised, is surrounded by water on three sides and divided from the rest of the world by a two-story chain link fence. The fence, broken up only by two actual gates manned by guards, stretches three-quarters of a mile along 37th Street, from New York Harbor on the north side to the Atlantic Ocean on the south.

Keep ReadingShow less
Clavicular Sued for Allegedly Injecting Underage Influencer With ‘Unapproved Drug’

The 'looksmaxxing' influencer Clavicular

Victor VIRGILE/Gamma-Rapho/Getty Images

Clavicular Sued for Allegedly Injecting Underage Influencer With ‘Unapproved Drug’

The ‘looksmaxxing’ influencer Clavicular is accused of inflicting physical, emotional, and psychological damage in a lawsuit filed by 18-year-old influencer Alorah Ziva. The 20-year-old streamer, born Braden Peters, is being sued for battery, emotional distress, and fraud.

According to court documents reviewed by Rolling Stone, Peters and Alorah Ziva, real name Aleksandra Vasilevna Mendoza, met through social media last year. The suit claims Peters “wanted her to be the female face for looksmaxxing” and assisted in her rise online by paying her $1,000 to film videos, for which he wrote the scripts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Clavicular’s YouTube Channels Terminated (Again)

Braden "Clavicular" Peters walks the runway during the Elena Velez Ready to Wear Fall/Winter 2026-2027 fashion show on Feb. 12, 2026 in NY.

Victor VIRGILE/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images

Clavicular’s YouTube Channels Terminated (Again)

YouTube has taken down two channels by the controversial “looksmaxxing” influencer Clavicular. The streamer, whose real name is Braden Peters, took to social media on Thursday seeking help to recover his accounts.

“Very sad news this morning,” Peters wrote on X. “My YouTube channels @ LiveWithClav & @ ClavLooksmax were terminated this morning with no warning or explanation. The channels consisted of livestream VODs and free courses created by me to help empower young men to be the best versions of themselves. Me and my team worked hard to ensure we followed YouTube’s TOS very strictly, blurring out all inapproriate language and sensitive topics.” Before ending his message, he tagged YouTube’s X accounts and asked, “Could you please help in recovering my accounts?”

Keep ReadingShow less
MrBeast Production Companies Sued Over Alleged Sexual Harassment, Emotional Distress

MrBeast on Sept. 13, 2025 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Chris Unger/TKO Worldwide LLC/Getty Images

MrBeast Production Companies Sued Over Alleged Sexual Harassment, Emotional Distress

MrBeastYouTube and GameChanger 24/7, two production companies owned by YouTube star MrBeast, have been sued by a former employee, Lorrayne Mavromatis, who alleges having experienced sexual harassment, emotional distress, and pregnancy discrimination.

A federal complaint filed in North Carolina details the work culture under MrBeast, real name Jimmy Donaldson, in which Mavromatis claims she was “treated differently than her male counterparts,” including being dismissed from otherwise entirely male meetings. The documents suggest that this extended to the executive level and alleges that male employees exhibited “demeaning treatment towards women.” In one instance, the complaint alleges “male executives laughed and made jokes at the office about female contestants of BeastGames who complained they did not have access to feminine hygiene products and clean underwear while participating in the show.”

Keep ReadingShow less